Assessing the effectiveness of household-level focal mass drug administration and community-wide mass drug administration for reducing malaria parasite infection prevalence and incidence in Southern Province, Zambia: study protocol for a community randomized controlled trial

Trials. 2015 Aug 13;16:347. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0862-3.

Abstract

Background: Mass drug administration (MDA) and focal MDA (fMDA) using dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine (DHAp), represent two strategies to maximize the use of existing information to achieve greater clearance of human infection and reduce the parasite reservoir, and provide longer chemoprophylactic protection against new infections. The primary aim of this study is to quantify the relative effectiveness of MDA and fMDA with DHAp against no mass treatment (standard of care) for reducing Plasmodium falciparum prevalence and incidence.

Methods/design: The study will be conducted along Lake Kariba in Southern Province, Zambia; an area of low to moderate malaria transmission and high coverage of vector control. A community randomized controlled trial (CRCT) of 60 health facility catchment areas (HFCAs) will be used to evaluate the impact of two rounds of MDA and fMDA interventions, relative to a control of no mass treatment, stratified by high and low transmission. Community residents in MDA HFCAs will be treated with DHAp at the end of the dry season (round one: November to December 2014) and the beginning of the rainy season (round two: February to March 2015). Community residents in fMDA HFCAs will be tested during the same two rounds for malaria parasites with a rapid diagnostic test; all positive individuals and all individuals living in their household will be treated with DHAp. Primary outcomes include malaria parasite prevalence (n = 5,640 children aged one month to under five-years-old), as measured by pre- and post-surveys, and malaria parasite infection incidence (n = 2,250 person-years among individuals aged three months and older), as measured by a monthly longitudinal cohort. The study is powered to detect approximately a 50 % relative reduction in these outcomes between each intervention group versus the control.

Discussion: Strengths of this trial include: a robust study design (CRCT); cross-sectional parasite surveys as well as a longitudinal cohort; and stratification of high and low transmission areas. Primary limitations include: statistical power to detect only a 50 % reduction in primary outcomes within high and low transmission strata; potential for contamination; and potential for misclassification of exposure.

Trial registration: Identifier: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02329301 . Registration date: 30 December 2014.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antimalarials / administration & dosage*
  • Antimalarials / adverse effects
  • Artemisinins / administration & dosage*
  • Artemisinins / adverse effects
  • Catchment Area, Health
  • Child, Preschool
  • Community Health Services*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Drug Combinations
  • Health Facilities
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Infant
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Malaria / diagnosis
  • Malaria / epidemiology
  • Malaria / parasitology
  • Malaria / prevention & control*
  • Malaria / transmission
  • Mass Screening
  • Prevalence
  • Program Evaluation
  • Quinolines / administration & dosage*
  • Quinolines / adverse effects
  • Research Design
  • Seasons
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Zambia / epidemiology

Substances

  • Antimalarials
  • Artemisinins
  • Drug Combinations
  • Quinolines
  • dihydroartemisinin
  • piperaquine

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02329301