Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134606. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Background: Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer has not been determined under normal wear time criteria in a large sample of subjects and accelerometer units. The aim of this study was to assess contralateral hip difference and inter-instrument reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ monitor in adults under long-term free-living conditions.

Methods: Eighty-seven adult subjects (28 men; mean (standard deviation) age 31.3 (12.2) years; body mass index 23.7 (3.1) kg/m2) concurrently wore two GT3X+ accelerometers (174 units in total) attached to contralateral hips for 21 days. Reliability was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, mixed model regression analyses and absolute measures of agreement for different lengths of data accumulation (single-day-, 7-day- and 21-day periods).

Results: There were no significant differences between contralateral hips (effect size ≤0.042; p ≥.213). Inter-instrument reliability increased with increased length of data-accumulation. For a 7-day measurement period (n = 232 weeks), limits of agreement were ±68 cpm (vertical axis) and ±81.3 cpm (vector magnitude) for overall physical activity (PA) level, ±51 min for sedentary time, ±18.2 min for light PA, ±6.3 min for moderate PA, ±3.5 min for vigorous PA, and ±6.7 min for moderate-to-vigorous PA.

Conclusions: The Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer is a reliable tool for measuring PA in adults under free-living conditions using normal data-reduction criteria. Contralateral hip differences are very small. We suggest accelerometers be attached to the right hip and data to be accumulated over several days of measurement.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Accelerometry / instrumentation
  • Actigraphy / instrumentation*
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Hip
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motor Activity / physiology*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sedentary Behavior
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.