Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134454.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134454. eCollection 2015.

Content Volatility of Scientific Topics in Wikipedia: A Cautionary Tale

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Content Volatility of Scientific Topics in Wikipedia: A Cautionary Tale

Adam M Wilson et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Wikipedia has quickly become one of the most frequently accessed encyclopedic references, despite the ease with which content can be changed and the potential for 'edit wars' surrounding controversial topics. Little is known about how this potential for controversy affects the accuracy and stability of information on scientific topics, especially those with associated political controversy. Here we present an analysis of the Wikipedia edit histories for seven scientific articles and show that topics we consider politically but not scientifically "controversial" (such as evolution and global warming) experience more frequent edits with more words changed per day than pages we consider "noncontroversial" (such as the standard model in physics or heliocentrism). For example, over the period we analyzed, the global warming page was edited on average (geometric mean ±SD) 1.9±2.7 times resulting in 110.9±10.3 words changed per day, while the standard model in physics was only edited 0.2±1.4 times resulting in 9.4±5.0 words changed per day. The high rate of change observed in these pages makes it difficult for experts to monitor accuracy and contribute time-consuming corrections, to the possible detriment of scientific accuracy. As our society turns to Wikipedia as a primary source of scientific information, it is vital we read it critically and with the understanding that the content is dynamic and vulnerable to vandalism and other shenanigans.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles

References

    1. Alexa. Alexa Top 500 Global Sites index [Internet]. 15 Dec 2013. Available: Alexa.com/topsites. Accessed 15 December 2013
    1. Wikimedia. Wikimedia Report Card—October 2014 [Internet]. 1 Oct 2014. Available: http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/. Accessed 1 October 2014
    1. Voss J. Measuring wikipedia International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Stockholm, Sweden: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics; 2005. pp. 221–231.
    1. Giles J. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature. 2005;438: 900–901. 10.1038/438900a - DOI - PubMed
    1. West K, Williamson J. Wikipedia: friend or foe? Reference Services Review. 2009;37: 260–271. 10.1108/00907320910982758 - DOI

Grant support

The authors have no support or funding to report.
Feedback