Using Qualitative Methods to Create a Home Health Web Application User Interface for Patients with Low Computer Proficiency
- PMID: 26290893
- PMCID: PMC4537144
- DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1166
Using Qualitative Methods to Create a Home Health Web Application User Interface for Patients with Low Computer Proficiency
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the investment in public reporting for a number of healthcare settings, evidence indicates that consumers do not routinely use available data to select providers. This suggests that existing reports do not adequately incorporate recommendations for consumer-facing reports or web applications.
Methods: Healthcentric Advisors and Brown University undertook a multi-phased approach to create a consumer-facing home health web application in Rhode Island. This included reviewing the evidence base review to identify design recommendations and then creating a paper prototype and wireframe. We performed qualitative research to iteratively test our proposed user interface with two user groups, home health consumers and hospital case managers, refining our design to create the final web application.
Results: To test our prototype, we conducted two focus groups, with a total of 13 consumers, and 28 case manager interviews. Both user groups responded favorably to the prototype, with the majority commenting that they felt this type of tool would be useful. Case managers suggested revisions to ensure the application conformed to laws requiring Medicare patients to have the freedom to choose among providers and could be incorporated into hospital workflow. After incorporating changes and creating the wireframe, we conducted usability testing interviews with 14 home health consumers and six hospital case managers. We found that consumers needed prompting to navigate through the wireframe; they demonstrated confusion through both their words and body language. As a result, we modified the web application's sequence, navigation, and function to provide additional instructions and prompts.
Discussion: Although we designed our web application for low literacy and low health literacy, using recommendations from the evidence base, we overestimated the extent to which older adults were familiar with using computers. Some of our key learnings and recommendations run counter to general web design principles, leading us to believe that such guidelines need to be adapted for this user group. As web applications proliferate, it is important to ensure those who are most vulnerable-who have the least knowledge and the lowest literacy, health literacy, and computer proficiency-can access, understand, and use them.
Conclusions: In order for the investment in public reporting to produce value, consumer-facing web applications need to be designed to address end users' unique strengths and limitations. Our findings may help others to build consumer-facing tools or technology targeted to a predominantly older population. We encourage others designing consumer-facing web technologies to critically evaluate their assumptions about user interface design, particularly if they are designing tools for older adults, and to test products with their end users.
Keywords: Informatics; health information technology; patient involvement; quality; quality improvement.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs.JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 May 20;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.3696. JMIR Hum Factors. 2015. PMID: 27025228 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative study of choosing home health care after hospitalization: the unintended consequences of 'patient choice' requirements.J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):634-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3164-7. Epub 2015 Jan 9. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25573089 Free PMC article.
-
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug;(24 Suppl):1-32. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001. PMID: 11569328 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019 Feb. Report No.: 19-EHC010-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019 Feb. Report No.: 19-EHC010-EF. PMID: 31013017 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Implementation of a user-centered framework in the development of a web-based health information database and call center.J Biomed Inform. 2011 Oct;44(5):897-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 17. J Biomed Inform. 2011. PMID: 21396486 Review.
Cited by
-
Providing Medical Information to Older Adults in a Web-Based Environment: Systematic Review.JMIR Aging. 2021 Feb 9;4(1):e24092. doi: 10.2196/24092. JMIR Aging. 2021. PMID: 33560228 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of a self-guided web-based exercise intervention (SPIN) to treat shoulder pain in people living with spinal cord injury: protocol of a mixed methods study.BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e031012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031012. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31530616 Free PMC article.
-
CDS, UX, and System Redesign - Promising Techniques and Tools to Bridge the Evidence Gap.EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Jul 9;3(2):1184. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1184. eCollection 2015. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015. PMID: 26290894 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Canadian Health Services Research Foundation Myth: People use health system report cards to make decisions about their healthcare. 2006. Sep, Available from: www.chsrf.ca/mythbusters/html/myth23_e.php.
-
- Fung CH, Lim Y, Mattke S, Damberg CL, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: The evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Int Med. 2008;148:111–123. - PubMed
-
- Schauffler HH, Mordavsky JK. Consumer reports in health care: do they make a difference? Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:69–89. - PubMed
-
- Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH. The public release of performance data: What do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA. 2000;283:1866–1874. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials