Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Television Campaign to Promote Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among the Elderly

Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):622-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1794. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

Abstract

Background: The U.S. policy goals regarding influenza vaccination coverage rate among the elderly include the increase in the coverage rate and the elimination of disparities across racial/ethnic groups.

Objective: To examine the potential effectiveness of a television (TV) campaign to increase seasonal influenza vaccination among the elderly.

Methods: We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, defined as incremental cost per additionally vaccinated Medicare individual) of a hypothetical nationwide TV campaign for influenza vaccination compared with no campaign. We measured the effectiveness of the nationwide TV campaign (advertised once a week at prime time for 30 seconds) during a 17-week influenza vaccination season among four racial/ethnic elderly groups (N=39 million): non-Hispanic white (W), non-Hispanic African American (AA), English-speaking Hispanic (EH), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic (SH).

Results: The hypothetical campaign cost was $5,960,000 (in 2012 US dollars). The estimated campaign effectiveness ranged from -1.1% (the SH group) to 1.42% (the W group), leading to an increased disparity in influenza vaccination among non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic African American (W-AA) groups (0.6 percentage points), W-EH groups (0.1 percentage points), and W-SH groups (1.5 percentage points). The estimated ICER was $23.54 (95% confidence interval $14.21-$39.37) per additionally vaccinated Medicare elderly in a probabilistic analysis. Race/ethnicity-specific ICERs were lowest among the EH group ($22.27), followed by the W group ($22.47) and the AA group ($30.55). The nationwide TV campaign was concluded to be reasonably cost-effective compared with a benchmark intervention (with ICER $44.39 per vaccinated individual) of a school-located vaccination program. Break-even analyses estimated the maximum acceptable campaign cost to be $14,870,000, which was comparable to the benchmark ICER.

Conclusions: The results could justify public expenditures on the implementation of a future nationwide TV campaign, which should include multilingual campaigns, for promoting seasonal influenza vaccination.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; elderly population; influenza vaccination; television campaign.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aging / ethnology
  • Aging / psychology*
  • Computer Simulation
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Decision Trees
  • Drug Costs*
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice* / ethnology
  • Health Promotion / economics*
  • Humans
  • Influenza Vaccines / economics*
  • Influenza, Human / economics*
  • Influenza, Human / ethnology
  • Influenza, Human / prevention & control*
  • Marketing of Health Services / economics*
  • Models, Economic
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care* / ethnology
  • Program Evaluation
  • Television / economics*
  • United States / epidemiology
  • Vaccination / economics*

Substances

  • Influenza Vaccines