Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Filters applied. Clear all
. 2015 Mar 25;2015:56-60.
eCollection 2015.

Visualizing Anomalies in Electronic Health Record Data: The Variability Explorer Tool

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Visualizing Anomalies in Electronic Health Record Data: The Variability Explorer Tool

Hossein Estiri et al. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

As Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are becoming more prevalent in the U.S. health care domain, the utility of EHR data in translational research and clinical decision-making gains prominence. Leveraging primay· care-based. multi-clinic EHR data, this paper introduces a web-based visualization tool, the Variability Explorer Tool (VET), to assist researchers with profiling variability among diagnosis codes. VET applies a simple statistical method to approximate probability distribution functions for the prevalence of any given diagnosis codes to visualize between-clinic and across-year variability. In a depression diagnoses use case, VET outputs demonstrated substantial variability in code use. Even though data quality research often characterizes variability as an indicator for data quality, variability can also reflect real characteristics of data, such as practice-level, and patient-level issues. Researchers benefit from recognizing variability in early stages of research to improve their research design and ensure validity and generalizability of research findings.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Outcome of the Variability Explorer Tool on the full cluster of depression ICD-9 codes
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Variability in depression data using ICD-9 code 296.3×
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Variability in depression dato using ICD-9 code 311

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services HITECH Act Enforcement Interim Final Rule. 2009. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/administrative/enforcementrule/hitechenforcementifr.html.
    1. Patel V, Jamoom E, Hsiao CJ, Furukawa MF, Buntin M. Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008–2011. J Gen intern Med. 2013;28:957–964. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2324-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hsiao C-J, Hing E, Ashman J. Trends in electronic health record system use among office-based physicians: United States, 2007–2012. Natl Health Stat Report. 2014;1 - PubMed
    1. (IOM) Medicine I of. Digital Infrastructure for the Learning Health System: The Foundation for Continuous Improvement in Health and Health Care. The Foundation for Continuous Improvement in Health and Health Care Workshop Serier Summary. 2011:1–311.
    1. Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA, et al. The Relationship between Electronic Health Record Use and Quality of Care over Time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:457–464. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3128. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback