Comparative Risk of Hospitalized Infection Associated With Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled in Medicare
- PMID: 26315675
- DOI: 10.1002/art.39399
Comparative Risk of Hospitalized Infection Associated With Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled in Medicare
Abstract
Objective: The risks of hospitalized infection associated with biologic agents used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether the associated risk of hospitalized infections differed between specific biologic agents used to treat RA.
Methods: In a retrospective cohort study using Medicare data from 2006-2011 for all enrolled patients with RA, new episodes of treatment with etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab, abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab were identified. Patients were required to have received another biologic agent previously and to have been continuously enrolled in Medicare medical and pharmacy plans during the baseline period and throughout followup. Followup started on the date of initiation of treatment with the new biologic agent (after previous treatment with a different biologic agent) and ended on the date of the earliest hospitalized infection, at 12 months, after an exposure gap of >30 days, or at the time of death or loss of Medicare coverage. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for hospitalized infection, adjusting for an infection risk score and other confounders.
Results: Of 31,801 new biologic treatment episodes in patients who had previously received another biologic agent, 12.0% were with etanercept, 15.2% with adalimumab, 5.9% with certolizumab, 4.4% with golimumab, 12.4% with infliximab, 28.9% with abatacept, 14.8% with rituximab, and 6.3% with tocilizumab. During followup, we identified 2,530 hospitalized infections; incidence rates ranged from 13.1 per 100 person-years (abatacept) to 18.7 per 100 person-years (rituximab). After adjustment, etanercept (HR 1.24, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.07-1.45), infliximab (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21-1.60), and rituximab (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21-1.53) had significantly higher HRs for hospitalized infection compared with abatacept.
Conclusion: In RA patients with prior exposure to a biologic agent, exposure to etanercept, infliximab, or rituximab was associated with a greater 1-year risk of hospitalized infection compared with the risk associated with exposure to abatacept.
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.
Similar articles
-
Risk of hospitalised infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biologics following a previous infection while on treatment with anti-TNF therapy.Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):1065-71. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204011. Epub 2014 Mar 7. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015. PMID: 24608404 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of hospitalized infection among rheumatoid arthritis patients concurrently treated with a biologic agent and denosumab.Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1456-64. doi: 10.1002/art.39075. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015. PMID: 25708920
-
Cost of biologics per treated patient across immune-mediated inflammatory disease indications in a pharmacy benefit management setting: a retrospective cohort study.Clin Ther. 2014 Aug 1;36(8):1231-41, 1241.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 23. Clin Ther. 2014. PMID: 25062652
-
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 8;5(5):CD012657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012657. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28481462 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 13;2016(5):CD012183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012183. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27175934 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Incidence of serious respiratory tract infections and associated characteristics in a population exposed to immunosuppressive therapies: a register-based population study.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):1184. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10039-2. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 39434000 Free PMC article.
-
Increased risk of cardiovascular events under the treatments with Janus kinase inhibitors versus biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective longitudinal population-based study using the Japanese health insurance database.RMD Open. 2024 Jun 17;10(2):e003885. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003885. RMD Open. 2024. PMID: 38886005 Free PMC article.
-
Drug retention of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study.RMD Open. 2023 Aug;9(3):e003160. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003160. RMD Open. 2023. PMID: 37597846 Free PMC article.
-
The Emerging Safety Profile of JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatic Diseases.BioDrugs. 2023 Sep;37(5):625-635. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00612-7. Epub 2023 Jun 23. BioDrugs. 2023. PMID: 37351790 Review.
-
Adherence patterns in naïve and prevalent use of infliximab and its biosimilar.BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Nov 1;6(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00295-7. BMC Rheumatol. 2022. PMID: 36316762 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
