Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Sep 17;373(12):1125-35.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507192. Epub 2015 Aug 30.

Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker

Vivek Y Reddy et al. N Engl J Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Cardiac pacemakers are limited by device-related complications, notably infection and problems related to pacemaker leads. We studied a miniaturized, fully self-contained leadless pacemaker that is nonsurgically implanted in the right ventricle with the use of a catheter.

Methods: In this multicenter study, we implanted an active-fixation leadless cardiac pacemaker in patients who required permanent single-chamber ventricular pacing. The primary efficacy end point was both an acceptable pacing threshold (≤2.0 V at 0.4 msec) and an acceptable sensing amplitude (R wave ≥5.0 mV, or a value equal to or greater than the value at implantation) through 6 months. The primary safety end point was freedom from device-related serious adverse events through 6 months. In this ongoing study, the prespecified analysis of the primary end points was performed on data from the first 300 patients who completed 6 months of follow-up (primary cohort). The rates of the efficacy end point and safety end point were compared with performance goals (based on historical data) of 85% and 86%, respectively. Additional outcomes were assessed in all 526 patients who were enrolled as of June 2015 (the total cohort).

Results: The leadless pacemaker was successfully implanted in 504 of the 526 patients in the total cohort (95.8%). The intention-to-treat primary efficacy end point was met in 270 of the 300 patients in the primary cohort (90.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 86.0 to 93.2, P=0.007), and the primary safety end point was met in 280 of the 300 patients (93.3%; 95% CI, 89.9 to 95.9; P<0.001). At 6 months, device-related serious adverse events were observed in 6.7% of the patients; events included device dislodgement with percutaneous retrieval (in 1.7%), cardiac perforation (in 1.3%), and pacing-threshold elevation requiring percutaneous retrieval and device replacement (in 1.3%).

Conclusions: The leadless cardiac pacemaker met prespecified pacing and sensing requirements in the large majority of patients. Device-related serious adverse events occurred in approximately 1 in 15 patients. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; LEADLESS II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02030418.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

  • A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System.
    Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, Soejima K, Neuzil P, Zhang S, Narasimhan C, Steinwender C, Brugada J, Lloyd M, Roberts PR, Sagi V, Hummel J, Bongiorni MG, Knops RE, Ellis CR, Gornick CC, Bernabei MA, Laager V, Stromberg K, Williams ER, Hudnall JH, Ritter P; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. Reynolds D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11;374(6):533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511643. Epub 2015 Nov 9. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26551877 Clinical Trial.
  • A Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker.
    Knops RE, Reddy VY, Ip JE, Doshi R, Exner DV, Defaye P, Canby R, Bongiorni MG, Shoda M, Hindricks G, Neužil P, Rashtian M, Breeman KTN, Nevo JR, Ganz L, Hubbard C, Cantillon DJ; Aveir DR i2i Study Investigators. Knops RE, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 22;388(25):2360-2370. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300080. Epub 2023 May 20. N Engl J Med. 2023. PMID: 37212442
  • Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial.
    Reddy VY, Knops RE, Sperzel J, Miller MA, Petru J, Simon J, Sediva L, de Groot JR, Tjong FV, Jacobson P, Ostrosff A, Dukkipati SR, Koruth JS, Wilde AA, Kautzner J, Neuzil P. Reddy VY, et al. Circulation. 2014 Apr 8;129(14):1466-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006987. Epub 2014 Mar 24. Circulation. 2014. PMID: 24664277 Clinical Trial.
  • Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.
    Tjong FV, Reddy VY. Tjong FV, et al. Circulation. 2017 Apr 11;135(15):1458-1470. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025037. Circulation. 2017. PMID: 28396380 Review.
  • Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Pacing Paradigm Change.
    Neuzil P, Reddy VY. Neuzil P, et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):68. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0619-3. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015. PMID: 26233700 Review.

Cited by

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources