Marginal and Internal Discrepancies of Posterior Zirconia-Based Crowns Fabricated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems Versus Metal-Ceramic

Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):509-11. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4359.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the marginal and internal fit of metalceramic and zirconia-based crowns.

Materials and methods: Forty standardized steel specimens were prepared to receive posterior crowns and randomly divided into four groups (n = 10): (1) metal-ceramic, (2) NobelProcera Zirconia, (3) Lava Zirconia, and (4) VITA In-Ceram YZ. All crowns were cemented with glass-ionomer agent and sectioned buccolingually. A scanning electron microscope was used for measurements. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed rank test (α = .05) statistical analyses were conducted.

Results: Significant differences (P < .0001) in marginal discrepancies were observed between metal-ceramic and zirconia groups. No differences were found for the axial wall fit (P = .057). Significant differences were shown among the groups in discrepancies at the occlusal cusp (P = .0012) and at the fossa (P = .0062). No differences were observed between surfaces.

Conclusions: All zirconia groups showed better values of marginal discrepancies than the metal-ceramic group. Procera Zirconia showed the lowest gaps.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cementation / methods
  • Computer-Aided Design*
  • Crowns*
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation*
  • Dental Materials / chemistry*
  • Dental Porcelain / chemistry
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Glass Ionomer Cements / chemistry
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Metal Ceramic Alloys / chemistry*
  • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
  • Random Allocation
  • Surface Properties
  • Zirconium / chemistry*

Substances

  • Dental Materials
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • In-Ceram Zirconia
  • Metal Ceramic Alloys
  • Dental Porcelain
  • Zirconium
  • zirconium oxide