Gender differences in justice evaluations: Evidence from fMRI
- PMID: 26348480
- DOI: 10.1037/apl0000048
Gender differences in justice evaluations: Evidence from fMRI
Abstract
Justice research examining gender differences has yielded contrasting findings. This study enlists advanced techniques in cognitive neuroscience (fMRI) to examine gender differences in brain activation patterns in response to procedural and distributive justice manipulations. We integrate social role, information processing, justice, and neuroscience literature to posit and test for gender differences in 2 neural subsystems known to be involved in the appraisal of self-relevant events. Results indicate that the relationship between justice information processing and neural activity in areas representing these subsystems is significantly influenced by gender, with greater activation for females than males during consideration of both procedural and distributive justice information. In addition, we find evidence that gender and distributive injustice interact to influence bargaining behavior, with females rejecting ultimatum game offers more frequently than males. Results also demonstrate activation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and ventral striatum brain regions during procedural justice evaluation is associated with offer rejection in females, but not in males. Managerial implications based on the study's support for gender differences in justice perceptions are discussed.
(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Differential activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex between male and female givers of social reputation.Neurosci Res. 2016 Feb;103:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 31. Neurosci Res. 2016. PMID: 26235682
-
The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 2;45(4):755-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.014. Epub 2006 Dec 18. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 17174987
-
Influence of role and gender on the use of distributive versus procedural justice principles.J Psychol. 2000 May;134(3):261-8. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600866. J Psychol. 2000. PMID: 10907704
-
Struggles for Equal Rights and Social Justice as Unrepresented and Represented in Psychological Research.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;50:1-29. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 25. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016. PMID: 26956068 Review.
-
Ethics, morality, and the psychology of climate justice.Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Dec;42:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 6. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33839440 Review.
Cited by
-
Leadership and credition: Followers' neural response to leaders who are perceived as transformational.Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Nov 4;16:943896. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.943896. eCollection 2022. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36408454 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Neural Correlates of Self-Construal Priming in the Ultimatum Game.Front Neurosci. 2019 Sep 24;13:994. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00994. eCollection 2019. Front Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31616239 Free PMC article.
-
Gender and Hemispheric Asymmetries in Acquired Sociopathy.Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 19;10:346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00346. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30941065 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
