Investigating social inequalities in exposure to drinking water contaminants in rural areas
- PMID: 26367702
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.046
Investigating social inequalities in exposure to drinking water contaminants in rural areas
Abstract
Few studies have assessed social inequalities in exposure to drinking water contaminants. This study explores this issue in 593 rural municipalities of Québec, Canada. Quartiles of an ecological composite deprivation index were used as a proxy of socioeconomic status. Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) and lead were chosen as proxies of chemical drinking water quality. The results show that the majority of deprived rural municipalities apply no treatment to their water (26%) or use a basic treatment (51%), whereas a relative majority of the wealthiest municipalities (40%) use advanced treatment. The proportion of municipalities having important lead (>5 μg/L) levels is highest in most deprived municipalities. Moreover, most deprived municipalities have a higher risk of high tap lead levels (RR = 1.33; 95%CI: 1.30, 1.36). Conversely, most deprived municipalities have a lower risk of high TTHMs levels (RR = 0.78; 95%CI: 0.69, 0.86). These findings suggest an environmental inequality in drinking water contaminants distribution in rural municipalities.
Keywords: Chemical drinking water quality; Environmental justice; Rural areas.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[Study for distribution level of disinfection byproducts in drinking water from six cities in China].Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2008 Mar;37(2):207-10. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2008. PMID: 18589610 Chinese.
-
Trihalomethanes in drinking water and the risk of death from esophageal cancer: does hardness in drinking water matter?J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2013;76(2):120-30. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2013.738410. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2013. PMID: 23294300
-
Magnesium in drinking water modifies the association between trihalomethanes and the risk of death from colon cancer.J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2011;74(6):392-403. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2011.538836. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2011. PMID: 21271439
-
Public Health Consequences of Lead in Drinking Water.Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018 Jun;5(2):255-262. doi: 10.1007/s40572-018-0193-0. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018. PMID: 29556976 Review.
-
Chemicals in the water environment. Where do the real and future threats lie?Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2012;48(4):347-53. doi: 10.4415/ANN_12_04_02. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2012. PMID: 23247131 Review.
Cited by
-
Inequalities in Environmental Cancer Risk and Carcinogen Exposures: A Scoping Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 4;20(9):5718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095718. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37174236 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improved Decision-Making: A Sociotechnical Utility-Based Framework for Drinking Water Investment.ACS ES T Eng. 2022 Aug 12;2(8):1475-1490. doi: 10.1021/acsestengg.2c00008. Epub 2022 May 5. ACS ES T Eng. 2022. PMID: 35991121 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental justice and drinking water quality: are there socioeconomic disparities in nitrate levels in U.S. drinking water?Environ Health. 2019 Jan 17;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0442-6. Environ Health. 2019. PMID: 30651108 Free PMC article.
-
Heterogeneity in the Relationship between Disinfection By-Products in Drinking Water and Cancer: A Systematic Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 14;15(5):979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050979. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29757939 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
