The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
- PMID: 26369828
- DOI: 10.7326/M15-0744
The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
Abstract
Use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has grown substantially in recent years. Increasing use has led to the realization that PICCs are associated with important complications, including thrombosis and infection. Moreover, some PICCs may not be placed for clinically valid reasons. Defining appropriate indications for insertion, maintenance, and care of PICCs is thus important for patient safety. An international panel was convened that applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop criteria for use of PICCs. After systematic reviews of the literature, scenarios related to PICC use, care, and maintenance were developed according to patient population (for example, general hospitalized, critically ill, cancer, kidney disease), indication for insertion (infusion of peripherally compatible infusates vs. vesicants), and duration of use (≤5 days, 6 to 14 days, 15 to 30 days, or ≥31 days). Within each scenario, appropriateness of PICC use was compared with that of other venous access devices. After review of 665 scenarios, 253 (38%) were rated as appropriate, 124 (19%) as neutral/uncertain, and 288 (43%) as inappropriate. For peripherally compatible infusions, PICC use was rated as inappropriate when the proposed duration of use was 5 or fewer days. Midline catheters and ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheters were preferred to PICCs for use between 6 and 14 days. In critically ill patients, nontunneled central venous catheters were preferred over PICCs when 14 or fewer days of use were likely. In patients with cancer, PICCs were rated as appropriate for irritant or vesicant infusion, regardless of duration. The panel of experts used a validated method to develop appropriate indications for PICC use across patient populations. These criteria can be used to improve care, inform quality improvement efforts, and advance the safety of medical patients.
Similar articles
-
The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) initiative: A summary and review of peripherally inserted central catheter and venous catheter appropriate use.J Hosp Med. 2016 Apr;11(4):306-10. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2525. Epub 2015 Dec 14. J Hosp Med. 2016. PMID: 26662622 Review.
-
Improving peripherally inserted central catheter appropriateness and reducing device-related complications: a quasiexperimental study in 52 Michigan hospitals.BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jan;31(1):23-30. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013015. Epub 2021 Mar 29. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022. PMID: 33782091 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Infectious Disease Physician Approval of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter With Appropriateness and Complications.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2017659. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17659. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33084898 Free PMC article.
-
Distal Superficial Femoral Vein Cannulation for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Infants with Cardiac Disease.Congenit Heart Dis. 2016 Dec;11(6):733-740. doi: 10.1111/chd.12398. Epub 2016 Jul 20. Congenit Heart Dis. 2016. PMID: 27436222
-
Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related thrombosis in critically ill patients.J Vasc Access. 2014 Sep-Oct;15(5):329-37. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000239. Epub 2014 Apr 25. J Vasc Access. 2014. PMID: 24811591 Review.
Cited by
-
Midline vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Nov 11:e245984. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5984. Online ahead of print. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39527077 Free PMC article.
-
Complications of tunneled and non-tunneled peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Front Surg. 2024 Oct 15;11:1469847. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1469847. eCollection 2024. Front Surg. 2024. PMID: 39474226 Free PMC article.
-
Performance and safety of PowerPICC catheters and accessories: a prospective observational study.BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 30;14(9):e081288. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081288. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39349374 Free PMC article.
-
Experience of a vascular ultrasound-guided program: from the ICU to the hospital.Ultrasound J. 2024 Sep 19;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00393-2. Ultrasound J. 2024. PMID: 39297921 Free PMC article.
-
Use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters and midline catheters for palliative care in patients with cancer: a systematic review.Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 26;32(7):464. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08664-3. Support Care Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38926160 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources