Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;23(2):640-7.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0913-5.

Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies

Affiliations

Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies

Angélique O J Cramer et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Many psychologists do not realize that exploratory use of the popular multiway analysis of variance harbors a multiple-comparison problem. In the case of two factors, three separate null hypotheses are subject to test (i.e., two main effects and one interaction). Consequently, the probability of at least one Type I error (if all null hypotheses are true) is 14 % rather than 5 %, if the three tests are independent. We explain the multiple-comparison problem and demonstrate that researchers almost never correct for it. To mitigate the problem, we describe four remedies: the omnibus F test, control of the familywise error rate, control of the false discovery rate, and preregistration of the hypotheses.

Keywords: Benjamini–Hochberg procedure; Factorial ANOVA; False discovery rate; Familywise error rate; Multiple comparison problem; Multiway ANOVA; Preregistration; Sequential Bonferroni; Type I error.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A visual representation of the sequential Bonferroni method for controlling familywise error rate. All p values are sorted in ascending order and are assigned a rank number from 1 (smallest) to k (largest). Next, one starts by evaluating the first (smallest) p value (p (1)) against the adjusted α (α adj), which is—for the first p value—equal to α divided by k. If the p value is smaller than α adj, then the first hypotheses H (1) is rejected, and one proceeds to the second p value. If the p value is not smaller than α adj, then one immediately accepts all null hypotheses and stops testing
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A visual representation of the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for controlling false discovery rate. All m p values are sorted in ascending order and assigned a rank number from 1 (smallest) to k (largest). Next, one starts by evaluating the last (largest) p value (p (k)) against the adjusted α (α adj), which is—for the last p value—equal to k divided by m times α. If the p value is smaller than α adj, then all null hypotheses are rejected and testing stops. If the p value is not smaller than α adj, then one proceeds to the next p value

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barber TX. Pitfalls in human research: Ten pivotal points. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1976.
    1. Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behavioural Brain Research. 2001;125:279–284. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00297-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B. 1995;57:289–300.
    1. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics. 2001;29:1165–1188. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013699998. - DOI
    1. Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munafò MR. Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;14:365–376. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. - DOI - PubMed