The study evaluated the incidence of and complications associated with the use of an intramedullary nail vs open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a sliding compression hip screw and plate in treating intertrochanteric fractures. The authors hypothesized that the biomechanically stronger and less invasive intramedullary nail would have superior results and fewer complications compared with ORIF. Patients followed for up to 1 year postoperatively were identified from the 5% nationwide sample of Medicare administrative claims data (1998-2007) using the corresponding International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification, codes 820.21 and 820.31. There were 9157 patients treated with intramedullary nails and 27,687 treated with compression screw and plate fixation. Intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with an intramedullary nail during this period increased from 3.3% to 63.1% compared with ORIF. Patients treated with an intramedullary nail had a higher adjusted risk of pulmonary embolism at 90 days (P=.003) and a higher risk of mortality at 1 year (P<.001) compared with those treated with ORIF. Patients who underwent intramedullary nailing during 2006 to 2007 had a lower adjusted risk of conversion to total hip replacement at 1 year (P=.037) compared with those who had ORIF. Over the decade of the study, intramedullary nail usage increased 59.8% compared with ORIF. Increased use of intramedullary nails compared with ORIF has not shown improved outcomes or decreased complications in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures. The increased use of intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric hip fractures appears to be multifactorial, including the less invasive nature of the surgery and increased experience with the closed surgical technique.
Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.