Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;18(5):422-3.
doi: 10.1111/jch.12680. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

Dollars and Discomfort: What Will People Be Willing to Give for Better Blood Pressure Assessment?

Affiliations

Dollars and Discomfort: What Will People Be Willing to Give for Better Blood Pressure Assessment?

Anthony J Viera et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 May.

Abstract

Recently, the US Preventive Services Task Force issued a draft recommendation to utilize 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension after screening. However, ABPM can be inconvenient and has some adverse effects such as pain and bruising from the repeated cuff inflations. In this national survey, we asked adults 30 years and older how much physical discomfort they would be willing to undergo to have the most accurate test available for evaluating possible high BP. We also asked how much they would be willing to pay to have the test. Among 1010 respondents, 95% of participants indicated willingness to undergo at least mild physical discomfort. The median amount people would be willing to pay was $25. These findings suggest that people are willing to undergo a bit of discomfort, and even pay a small amount, for the benefit of accurate BP assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Piper MA, Evans CV, Burda BU, et al. Diagnostic and predictive accuracy of blood pressure screening methods with consideration of rescreening intervals: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:192–204. - PubMed
    1. Krause T, Lovibond K, Caulfield M, et al. Management of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;343:d4891. - PubMed
    1. Viera AJ, Lingley K, Hinderliter AL. Tolerability of the Oscar 2 ambulatory blood pressure monitor among research participants: a cross‐sectional repeated measures study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;27:59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lovibond K, Jowett S, Barton P, et al. Cost‐effectiveness of options for the diagnosis of high blood pressure in primary care: a modelling study. Lancet. 2011;378:1219–1230. - PubMed
    1. Draft Recommendation Statement: Hypertension in Adults: Screening and Home Monitoring. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/Recommendatio.... Accessed June 19, 2015.

Publication types