Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Antiviral Strategies for the Treatment of HBeAg-Positive and HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B in the United Kingdom

Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):800-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

Abstract

Background: Seven drugs are licensed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the United Kingdom. Which initial treatment, secondary therapy, and whether antivirals should be given alone or in combination are questions of considerable uncertainty.

Objective: The aim of this model was to undertake a comprehensive economic evaluation of all antiviral treatments for CHB to recommend the most cost-effective therapeutic sequence.

Methods: We developed a probabilistic Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of all clinically relevant antiviral treatment sequences for nucleos(t)ide-naive adults with hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive or HBeAg-negative CHB. Relative rates of HBeAg seroconversion and viral suppression were obtained from a network meta-analysis. Data on mortality, antiviral drug resistance, durability of response, adverse events, and costs were obtained from published literature. Results are reported in terms of lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and expected net benefit.

Results: In the base-case analysis, pegylated interferon alpha-2a (peg-IFN α-2a) followed by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was most effective and cost-effective in HBeAg-positive patients, with a cost of £7488 per QALY gained compared with no treatment. In HBeAg-negative patients, peg-IFN α-2a followed by entecavir was most effective and cost-effective, with a cost of £6981 per QALY gained. The model was robust to a wide range of sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Peg-IFN α-2a followed by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir is the most effective antiviral treatment strategy for people with both variants of CHB. At a cost of less than £10,000 per QALY gained, these sequences are considered cost-effective in England and Wales. The results of this analysis were used to inform 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline recommendations.

Keywords: antiviral treatment; chronic hepatitis B; cost-effectiveness analysis; interferon-alpha; nucleosides; nucleotides.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Network Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antiviral Agents / economics*
  • Antiviral Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Drug Costs*
  • Drug Substitution / economics
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / economics
  • Female
  • Hepatitis B e Antigens / blood*
  • Hepatitis B, Chronic / blood
  • Hepatitis B, Chronic / diagnosis
  • Hepatitis B, Chronic / drug therapy*
  • Hepatitis B, Chronic / economics*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Markov Chains
  • Models, Economic
  • Patient Selection
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Probability
  • Quality of Life
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • State Medicine / economics
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Biomarkers
  • Hepatitis B e Antigens