Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep 24:6:774.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00774. eCollection 2015.

The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance

Xiao-Min Liu et al. Front Plant Sci. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are beneficial plant symbionts that have been successfully used in agriculture to increase seedling emergence, plant weight, crop yield, and disease resistance. Some PGPR strains release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can directly and/or indirectly mediate increases in plant biomass, disease resistance, and abiotic stress tolerance. This mini-review focuses on the enhancement of plant abiotic stress tolerance by bacterial VOCs. The review considers how PGPR VOCs induce tolerance to salinity and drought stress and also how they improve sulfur and iron nutrition in plants. The potential complexities in evaluating the effects of PGPR VOCs are also discussed.

Keywords: abiotic stress; drought; iron deficiency; plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; salinity; sulfur nutrition; volatile organic compounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The effects of microbial volatiles on plant abiotic stress tolerance. VOCs can modulate Arabidopsis sodium homeostasis via tissue-specific regulation of HKT1 and possibly also via the SOS pathway. Accumulation of H2O2 and nitric oxide is involved in the VOC-induced drought tolerance in plants. Accumulation of choline synthesized by VOC-induced PEAMT and other osmo-protectants may be a common mechanism for increasing osmotic protection in salt- or drought-stressed plants. VOCs also trigger the expression of FIT1, FRO2, and IRT1 to facilitate iron uptake and plant growth. Under conditions of sulfur starvation, plants directly take up and assimilate the S-containing compounds (e.g., dimethyl disulfide) emitted from some PGPR. See text for details.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Audrain B., Farag M. A., Ryu C. M., Ghigo J. M. (2015). Role of bacterial volatile compounds in bacterial biology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 222–233. 10.1093/femsre/fuu013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bailly A., Weisskopf L. (2012). The modulating effect of bacterial volatiles on plant growth: current knowledge and future challenges. Plant Signal. Behav. 7, 79–85. 10.4161/psb.7.1.18418 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barriuso J., Solano B. R., Gutierrez Manero F. J. (2008). Protection against pathogen and salt stress by four plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from Pinus sp. on Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytopathology 98, 666–672. 10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0666 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bitas V., Kim H. S., Bennett J. W., Kang S. (2013). Sniffing on microbes: diverse roles of microbial volatile organic compounds in plant health. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 835–843. 10.1094/MPMI-10-12-0249-CR - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blom D., Fabbri C., Connor E. C., Schiestl F. P., Klauser D. R., Boller T., et al. (2011). Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 3047–3058. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02582.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources