Sequence specificity between interacting and non-interacting homologs identifies interface residues--a homodimer and monomer use case

BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 8;16:325. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0758-y.

Abstract

Background: Protein families participating in protein-protein interactions may contain sub-families that have different binding characteristics, ranging from right binding to showing no interaction at all. Composition differences at the sequence level in these sub-families are often decisive to their differential functional interaction. Methods to predict interface sites from protein sequences typically exploit conservation as a signal. Here, instead, we provide proof of concept that the sequence specificity between interacting versus non-interacting groups can be exploited to recognise interaction sites.

Results: We collected homodimeric and monomeric proteins and formed homologous groups, each having an interacting (homodimer) subgroup and a non-interacting (monomer) subgroup. We then compiled multiple sequence alignments of the proteins in the homologous groups and identified compositional differences between the homodimeric and monomeric subgroups for each of the alignment positions. Our results show that this specificity signal distinguishes interface and other surface residues with 40.9% recall and up to 25.1% precision.

Conclusions: To our best knowledge, this is the first large scale study that exploits sequence specificity between interacting and non-interacting homologs to predict interaction sites from sequence information only. The performance obtained indicates that this signal contains valuable information to identify protein-protein interaction sites.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Area Under Curve
  • Dimerization
  • Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs
  • Proteins / chemistry*
  • Proteins / metabolism
  • ROC Curve

Substances

  • Proteins