Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease
- PMID: 26457558
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509038
Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease
Abstract
Background: In patients with coronary artery disease who receive metallic drug-eluting coronary stents, adverse events such as late target-lesion failure may be related in part to the persistent presence of the metallic stent frame in the coronary-vessel wall. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds have been developed to attempt to improve long-term outcomes.
Methods: In this large, multicenter, randomized trial, 2008 patients with stable or unstable angina were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular (Absorb) scaffold (1322 patients) or an everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium (Xience) stent (686 patients). The primary end point, which was tested for both noninferiority (margin, 4.5 percentage points for the risk difference) and superiority, was target-lesion failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization) at 1 year.
Results: Target-lesion failure at 1 year occurred in 7.8% of patients in the Absorb group and in 6.1% of patients in the Xience group (difference, 1.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 3.9; P=0.007 for noninferiority and P=0.16 for superiority). There was no significant difference between the Absorb group and the Xience group in rates of cardiac death (0.6% and 0.1%, respectively; P=0.29), target-vessel myocardial infarction (6.0% and 4.6%, respectively; P=0.18), or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (3.0% and 2.5%, respectively; P=0.50). Device thrombosis within 1 year occurred in 1.5% of patients in the Absorb group and in 0.7% of patients in the Xience group (P=0.13).
Conclusions: In this large-scale, randomized trial, treatment of noncomplex obstructive coronary artery disease with an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold, as compared with an everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent, was within the prespecified margin for noninferiority with respect to target-lesion failure at 1 year. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; ABSORB III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01751906.).
Comment in
-
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds--Will Promise Become Reality?N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1969-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1512331. Epub 2015 Oct 12. N Engl J Med. 2015. PMID: 26457446 No abstract available.
-
The ABSORB III Trial: Potential New Concepts for Intracranial Atherosclerosis in the Post-SAMMPRIS Era.Neurosurgery. 2016 Feb;78(2):N19-20. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000479894.02619.6f. Neurosurgery. 2016. PMID: 26779796 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 26875648
-
A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2015 Jan 3;385(9962):43-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61455-0. Epub 2014 Sep 14. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 25230593 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial.Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2479-2491. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32050-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27806897 Clinical Trial.
-
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: what have we learned from randomized-controlled clinical trials?Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Jan;28(1):77-89. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000414. Coron Artery Dis. 2017. PMID: 27561169 Review.
-
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):537-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00979-4. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 26597771 Review.
Cited by
-
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bioresorbable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents versus Fully Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 7;13(19):5949. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195949. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39408009 Free PMC article.
-
Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Below-the-Knee Arterial Disease: A Literature Review of New Developments.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 3;25(4):133. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504133. eCollection 2024 Apr. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39076564 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Status of and Future Prospects for Drug-Eluting Stents and Scaffolds in Infrapopliteal Arteries.J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):1757. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061757. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38541981 Free PMC article. Review.
-
First randomised controlled trial comparing the sirolimus-eluting bioadaptor with the zotarolimus-eluting drug-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: 12-month clinical and imaging data from the multi-centre, international, BIODAPTOR-RCT.EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Oct 24;65:102304. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102304. eCollection 2023 Nov. EClinicalMedicine. 2023. PMID: 38106564 Free PMC article.
-
Drug-eluting, balloon-expandable, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds reduce neointimal thickness and stenosis in an animal model of percutaneous peripheral intervention.JVS Vasc Sci. 2023 Jun 8;4:100114. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100114. eCollection 2023. JVS Vasc Sci. 2023. PMID: 37546529 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical