Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 124 (6), 805-12

Associations of Cognitive Function Scores With Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of Green and Conventional Office Environments

Affiliations

Associations of Cognitive Function Scores With Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of Green and Conventional Office Environments

Joseph G Allen et al. Environ Health Perspect.

Abstract

Background: The indoor built environment plays a critical role in our overall well-being because of both the amount of time we spend indoors (~90%) and the ability of buildings to positively or negatively influence our health. The advent of sustainable design or green building strategies reinvigorated questions regarding the specific factors in buildings that lead to optimized conditions for health and productivity.

Objective: We simulated indoor environmental quality (IEQ) conditions in "Green" and "Conventional" buildings and evaluated the impacts on an objective measure of human performance: higher-order cognitive function.

Methods: Twenty-four participants spent 6 full work days (0900-1700 hours) in an environmentally controlled office space, blinded to test conditions. On different days, they were exposed to IEQ conditions representative of Conventional [high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)] and Green (low concentrations of VOCs) office buildings in the United States. Additional conditions simulated a Green building with a high outdoor air ventilation rate (labeled Green+) and artificially elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) levels independent of ventilation.

Results: On average, cognitive scores were 61% higher on the Green building day and 101% higher on the two Green+ building days than on the Conventional building day (p < 0.0001). VOCs and CO2 were independently associated with cognitive scores.

Conclusions: Cognitive function scores were significantly better under Green+ building conditions than in the Conventional building conditions for all nine functional domains. These findings have wide-ranging implications because this study was designed to reflect conditions that are commonly encountered every day in many indoor environments.

Citation: Allen JG, MacNaughton P, Satish U, Santanam S, Vallarino J, Spengler JD. 2016. Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: a controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environ Health Perspect 124:805-812; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510037.

Conflict of interest statement

United Technologies was not involved in the data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, data presentation, or drafting of the manuscript.

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average cognitive function scores and standard error bars by domain for the Conventional, Green, and two Green+ conditions, normalized to the Green condition by dividing all scores by the average score during the Green condition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cognitive function scores by domain and participant and the corresponding carbon dioxide concentration in their cubicles. Each line represents the change in an individual’s CO2 exposure and cognitive scores from one condition to the next, normalized to the average CO2 exposure across all participants during the Green+ conditions.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 20 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists) Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH; 2015. 2015 Guide to Occupational Exposure Values.
    1. Allen JG, MacIntosh DL, Saltzman LE, Baker BJ, Matheson JM, Recht JR, et al. Elevated corrosion rates and hydrogen sulfide in homes with ‘Chinese Drywall.’. Sci Total Environ. 2012;426:113–119. - PubMed
    1. Allen JG, MacNaughton P, Laurent JG, Flanigan SS, Eitland ES, Spengler JD. Green buildings and health. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015;2(3):250–258. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers) Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE; 2013a. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2013. Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.
    1. ASHRAE. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE; 2013b. 2013 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Feedback