Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan;21(1):20-9.
doi: 10.1111/anec.12321. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

Atrial Fibrillation Predictors: Importance of the Electrocardiogram

Affiliations
Review

Atrial Fibrillation Predictors: Importance of the Electrocardiogram

David M German et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Substantial interest has developed in the primary prevention of AF, and thus the identification of individuals at risk for developing AF. The electrocardiogram (ECG) provides a wealth of information, which is of value in predicting incident AF. The PR interval and P wave indices (including P wave duration, P wave terminal force, P wave axis, and other measures of P wave morphology) are discussed with regard to their ability to predict and characterize AF risk in the general population. The predictive value of the QT interval, ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy, and findings of atrial and ventricular ectopy are also discussed. Efforts are underway to develop models that predict AF incidence in the general population; however, at present, little information from the ECG is included in these models. The ECG provides a great deal of information on AF risk and has the potential to contribute substantially to AF risk estimation, but more research is needed.

Keywords: P wave indices; atrial fibrillation; electrocardiogram; primary prevention; risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A representative P wave and PR segment in lead V1. The PR interval, P wave duration (Pwd), P wave amplitude (Pwa), P′ amplitude (PPa), P′ duration (PPd), and PR segment depression (PRD) are marked. The P wave terminal force (PTFV1) is derived by multiplication of PPa by PPd.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The vectorcardiographic P loop morphology and the spatial P loop vector characterize atrial conduction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W, et al. Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:1142–1147. - PubMed
    1. Lloyd‐Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP, et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2004;110:1042–1046. - PubMed
    1. Glotzer TV, Hellkamp AS, Zimmerman J, et al. Atrial high rate episodes detected by pacemaker diagnostics predict death and stroke: report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST). Circulation 2003;107:1614–1619. - PubMed
    1. Glotzer TV, Daoud EG, Wyse DG, et al. The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:474–480. - PubMed
    1. Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 2012;366:120–129. - PubMed

Publication types