Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 16 (3 Suppl), 267-73

A Profilometric Study to Assess the Role of Toothbrush and Toothpaste in Abrasion Process

Affiliations

A Profilometric Study to Assess the Role of Toothbrush and Toothpaste in Abrasion Process

Sandeep Kumar et al. J Dent (Shiraz).

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Despite of many studies conducted on toothbrushes and toothpaste to find out the culprit for abrasion, there is no clear cut evidence to pin point the real cause for abrasion.

Purpose: An in vitro assessment of the role of different types of toothbrushes (soft/ medium/hard) in abrasion process when used in conjunction with and without a dentifrice.

Materials and method: Forty five freshly extracted, sound, human incisor teeth were collected for this study. Enamel specimens of approximately 9 mm(2) were prepared by gross trimming of extracted teeth using a lathe machine (Baldor 340 Dental lathe; Ohio, USA). They were mounted on separate acrylic bases. The specimens were divided into three groups, each group containing 15 mounted specimens. Group 1 specimens were brushed with soft toothbrush; Group 2 brushed with medium toothbrush and Group 3 with hard toothbrush. Initially, all the mounted specimens in each group were brushed using dentifrice and then the same procedure was repeated with water as control. Profilometric readings were recorded pre and post to tooth brushing and the differences in readings served as proxy measure to assess surface abrasion. These values were then compared to each other. Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were performed.

Results: The results showed that brushing, with water alone, caused less abrasion than when toothpaste was added (p< 0.008). When brushed with water, the harder toothbrush caused more abrasion (higher Ra-value), but when toothpaste was added, the softer toothbrush caused more abrasion (p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Besides supporting the fact that toothpaste is needed to create a significant abrasion, this study also showed that a softer toothbrush can cause more abrasion than harder ones. The flexibility of bristles is only secondary to abrasion process and abrasivity of dentifrice has an important role in abrasion process.

Keywords: Abrasion; Profilometer; Tooth-paste; Toothbrush.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Customized automated brushing machine to deliver uniform force.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Profilometric kit along with the profilometer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 PubMed Central articles

References

    1. Yankell SL, Shi X, Emling RC, Bucker R, Loudin S. Laboratory evaluation of two bi-level toothbrush products for subgingival access and gingival margin cleaning. J Clin Dent. 2000; 11: 20–23. - PubMed
    1. Versteeg PA, Rosema NA, Timmerman MF, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden GA. Evaluation of two soft manual toothbrushes with different filament designs in relation to gingival abrasion and plaque removing efficacy. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008; 6: 166–173. - PubMed
    1. Hoover JN, Singer DL, Pahwa P, Komiyama K. Clinical evaluation of a light energy conversion toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol. 1992; 19: 434–436. - PubMed
    1. Dyer D, Addy M, Newcombe RG. Studies in vitro of abrasion by different manual toothbrush heads and a standard toothpaste. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27: 99–103. - PubMed
    1. Parizotto SP, Rodrigues CR, Singer Jda M, Sef HC. Effectiveness of low cost toothbrushes, with or without dentifrice, in the removal of bacterial plaque in deciduous teeth. PesquiOdontol Bras. 2003; 17: 17–23. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback