Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 14 (2), 118-42

Can We Selectively Reduce Appetite for Energy-Dense Foods? An Overview of Pharmacological Strategies for Modification of Food Preference Behavior


Can We Selectively Reduce Appetite for Energy-Dense Foods? An Overview of Pharmacological Strategies for Modification of Food Preference Behavior

Ewa Bojanowska et al. Curr Neuropharmacol.


Excessive intake of food, especially palatable and energy-dense carbohydrates and fats, is largely responsible for the growing incidence of obesity worldwide. Although there are a number of candidate antiobesity drugs, only a few of them have been proven able to inhibit appetite for palatable foods without the concurrent reduction in regular food consumption. In this review, we discuss the interrelationships between homeostatic and hedonic food intake control mechanisms in promoting overeating with palatable foods and assess the potential usefulness of systemically administered pharmaceuticals that impinge on the endogenous cannabinoid, opioid, aminergic, cholinergic, and peptidergic systems in the modification of food preference behavior. Also, certain dietary supplements with the potency to reduce specifically palatable food intake are presented. Based on human and animal studies, we indicate the most promising therapies and agents that influence the effectiveness of appetite-modifying drugs. It should be stressed, however, that most of the data included in our review come from preclinical studies; therefore, further investigations aimed at confirming the effectiveness and safety of the aforementioned medications in the treatment of obese humans are necessary.


Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Central and peripheral messengers conveying information about food value to the brain feeding centers, and the relationship between body weight changes and balanced or imbalanced hedonic and homeostatic drive to eat.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 5 PubMed Central articles


    1. Genné-Bacon E.A. Thinking evolutionarily about obesity. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2014;87:99–112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berthoud H-R. The neurobiology of food intake in an obesogenic environment. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2012;71:478–487. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112000602. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. la Fleur S.E., Serlie M.J. The interaction between nutrition and the brain and its consequences for body weight gain and metabolism; studies in rodents and men. Best Pract. Re.s Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;28:649–659. . - PubMed
    1. Deglaire A., Méjean C., Castetbon K., Kesse-Guyot E., Hercberg S., Schlich P. Associations between weight status and liking scores for sweet, salt and fat according to the gender in adults (The Nutrinet-Santé study). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015;69:40–46. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lanfer A., Knof K., Barba G., Veidebaum T., Papoutsou S., de Henauw S., Soós T., Moreno L.A., Ahrens W., Lissner L. Taste preferences in association with dietary habits and weight status in European children: results from the IDEFICS study. Int. J. Obes. 2012;36:27–34. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.164. - DOI - PubMed