Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jan;54(1):24-31.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000443.

How Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance Measures

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

How Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance Measures

David E Kanouse et al. Med Care. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Patients' comments about doctors are increasingly available on the internet. The effects of these anecdotal accounts on consumers' engagement with reports on doctor quality, use of more statistically reliable performance measures, and ability to choose doctors wisely are unknown.

Objective: To examine the effects of providing patient comments along with standardized performance information in a web-based public report.

Design: Participants were randomly assigned to view 1 of 6 versions of a website presenting comparative performance information on fictitious primary care doctors. Versions varied by the combination of information types [Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), and patient comments] and number of doctors.

Participants: A random sample of working-age adults (N=848) from an online panel representing the noninstitutionalized population of the United States.

Main measures: Time spent and actions taken on the website, probing of standardized measures, and decision quality (chosen doctor rated highest on quantifiable metrics, chosen doctor not dominated by another choice). Secondary outcomes were perceived usefulness and trustworthiness of performance metrics and evaluations of the website.

Key results: Inclusion of patient comments increased time spent on the website by 35%-42% and actions taken (clicks) by 106%-117% compared with versions presenting only CAHPS and HEDIS measures (P<0.01). It also reduced participants' attention to standardized measures (eg, percentage of time probing HEDIS measures dropped by 67%, P<0.01). When patient comments were present, fewer participants chose the doctor scoring highest on standardized metrics (44%-49% vs. 61%-62%, P<0.01).

Conclusions: Including patient comments in physician performance reports enhances consumers' engagement but reduces their attention to standardized measures and substantially increases suboptimal choices. More research is needed to explore whether integrated reporting strategies could leverage the positive effects of patient comments on consumer engagement without undermining consumers' use of other important metrics for informing choice among doctors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. [Accessed March 17, 2015];Consumer Health Ratings.com: your guide to online healthcare ratings. Available at: http://www.consumerhealthratings.com.
    1. Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D, et al. Taking patients’ narratives about clinicians from anecdotes to science. New Engl J Med. 2015;373:675–679. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [Accessed March 17, 2015];Public Reports on Provider Performance for Consumers. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resourc....
    1. Sinaiko AD, Eastman D, Rosenthal MB. How report cards on physicians, physician groups, and hospitals can have greater impact on consumer choices. Health Aff. 2012;31:602–611. - PubMed
    1. Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg NB, et al. Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:942–946. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types