How Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance Measures
- PMID: 26551765
- PMCID: PMC5496004
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000443
How Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance Measures
Abstract
Background: Patients' comments about doctors are increasingly available on the internet. The effects of these anecdotal accounts on consumers' engagement with reports on doctor quality, use of more statistically reliable performance measures, and ability to choose doctors wisely are unknown.
Objective: To examine the effects of providing patient comments along with standardized performance information in a web-based public report.
Design: Participants were randomly assigned to view 1 of 6 versions of a website presenting comparative performance information on fictitious primary care doctors. Versions varied by the combination of information types [Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), and patient comments] and number of doctors.
Participants: A random sample of working-age adults (N=848) from an online panel representing the noninstitutionalized population of the United States.
Main measures: Time spent and actions taken on the website, probing of standardized measures, and decision quality (chosen doctor rated highest on quantifiable metrics, chosen doctor not dominated by another choice). Secondary outcomes were perceived usefulness and trustworthiness of performance metrics and evaluations of the website.
Key results: Inclusion of patient comments increased time spent on the website by 35%-42% and actions taken (clicks) by 106%-117% compared with versions presenting only CAHPS and HEDIS measures (P<0.01). It also reduced participants' attention to standardized measures (eg, percentage of time probing HEDIS measures dropped by 67%, P<0.01). When patient comments were present, fewer participants chose the doctor scoring highest on standardized metrics (44%-49% vs. 61%-62%, P<0.01).
Conclusions: Including patient comments in physician performance reports enhances consumers' engagement but reduces their attention to standardized measures and substantially increases suboptimal choices. More research is needed to explore whether integrated reporting strategies could leverage the positive effects of patient comments on consumer engagement without undermining consumers' use of other important metrics for informing choice among doctors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Consumer response to patient experience measures in complex information environments.Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl:S56-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826c84e1. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 23064278
-
Choosing Doctors Wisely: Can Assisted Choice Enhance Patients' Selection of Clinicians?Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Oct;76(5):572-596. doi: 10.1177/1077558717743822. Epub 2017 Nov 25. Med Care Res Rev. 2019. PMID: 29172972 Clinical Trial.
-
Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 25934100 Free PMC article.
-
Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians.BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 26;15:416. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1099-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 26410383 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 10;18(5):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4430. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27165558 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Web-Based Public Reporting as a Decision-Making Tool for Consumers of Long-Term Care in the United States and the United Kingdom: Systematic Analysis of Report Cards.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 14;7:e44382. doi: 10.2196/44382. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 38096004 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a protocol for eliciting narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experiences of care.Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):271-281. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14134. Epub 2023 Jan 29. Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 36645204 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Popular Science Articles by Physicians on Their Performance on Online Medical Platforms.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;10(12):2432. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122432. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36553956 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated with the Patient/Client Use of Report Cards, Physician Rating Websites, Social Media, and Google for Hospital and Physician Selection: A Nationwide Survey.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 1;10(10):1931. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101931. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36292378 Free PMC article.
-
Developing the Quality in Nutrition Care Model for Dietitians (QUINCE-MOD) in primary care: A mixed-method survey of healthcare consumers and professionals.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023 Feb;36(1):311-322. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13065. Epub 2022 Jul 31. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023. PMID: 35822586 Free PMC article.
References
-
- [Accessed March 17, 2015];Consumer Health Ratings.com: your guide to online healthcare ratings. Available at: http://www.consumerhealthratings.com.
-
- Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D, et al. Taking patients’ narratives about clinicians from anecdotes to science. New Engl J Med. 2015;373:675–679. - PubMed
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [Accessed March 17, 2015];Public Reports on Provider Performance for Consumers. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resourc....
-
- Sinaiko AD, Eastman D, Rosenthal MB. How report cards on physicians, physician groups, and hospitals can have greater impact on consumer choices. Health Aff. 2012;31:602–611. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
