Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 10:15:89.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0210-2.

Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography

Affiliations

Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography

Paula Scariati et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: In 2009 the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated its breast cancer screening guidelines to recommend that average-risk women obtain a screening mammogram every two years starting at age 50 instead of annually starting at age 40. Inconsistencies in data regarding the benefit versus risk of routine screening for women less than 50-years-of-age led to a second recommendation - that women in their forties engage in a shared decision making process with their provider to make an individualized choice about screening mammography that was right for them. In response, a web-based interactive mammography screening decision aid was developed and evaluated.

Methods: The decision aid was developed using an agile, iterative process. It was further honed based on feedback from clinical and technical subject matter experts. A convenience sample of 51 age- and risk-appropriate women was recruited to pilot the aid. Pre-post decisional conflict and screening choice was assessed.

Results: Women reported a significant reduction in overall decisional conflict after using the decision aid (Z = -5.3, p < 0.001). These participants also reported statistically significant reductions in each of the decisional conflict subscales: feeling uncertain (Z = -4.7, p < 0.001), feeling uninformed (Z = -5.2, p < 0.001), feeling unclear about values (Z = -5.0, p < 0.001), and feeling unsupported (Z = -4.0, p < 0.001). However, a woman's intention to obtain a screening mammogram in the next 1-2 years was not significantly changed (Wilcoxon signed-rank Z = -1.508, p = 0.132).

Conclusion: This mammography screening decision aid brings value to patient care not by impacting what a woman chooses but by lending clarity to why or how she chooses it.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Current breast cancer risk. Infographic depicting current breast cancer risk statistic for average-risk women in their 40s
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Values clarification. Ranking factors to consider when making a decision about screening mammography, by importance
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient personal values ranking results. Participants’ ratings of personal values when considering a decision about screening mammography, by importance

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murphy AM. Mammography screening for breast cancer: a view from 2 worlds (Editorial) JAMA. 2010;303:166–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1991. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woolf SH. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendation of the US Preventive Services Task Force (Editorial) JAMA. 2010;303:162–3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening (Editorial) JAMA. 2010;303:172–3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1990. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keen JD. Promoting screening mammography: insight or uptake? J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23:775–82. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.06.100065. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirsch BR, Lyman GH. Breast cancer screening with mammography. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011;13:63–70. doi: 10.1007/s11912-010-0142-z. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types