Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):842-51.
doi: 10.3945/an.115.008870. Print 2015 Nov.

Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information

Shahla Wunderlich  1 , Kelsey A Gatto  2
Affiliations
Review

Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information

Shahla Wunderlich et al. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been available for commercial purchase since the 1990s, allowing producers to increase crop yields through bioengineering that creates herbicide-resistant and insect-resistant varieties. However, consumer knowledge about GMOs has not increased at the same rate as the adoption of GMO crops. Consumers worldwide are displaying limited understanding, misconceptions, and even unfamiliarity with GMO food products. Many consumers report that they receive information about GMO food products from the media, Internet, and other news sources. These sources may be less reliable than scientific experts whom consumers trust more to present the facts. Although many in the United States support mandatory GMO labeling (similar to current European standards), consumer awareness of current GMO labeling is low. A distinction must also be made between GMO familiarity and scientific understanding, because those who are more familiar with it tend to be more resistant to bioengineering, whereas those with higher scientific knowledge scores tend to have less negative attitudes toward GMOs. This brings to question the relation between scientific literacy, sources of information, and overall consumer knowledge and perception of GMO foods.

Keywords: GMOs; awareness; genetic engineering; genetically modified organisms; knowledge; labeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Timeline of genetically modified organism history. Bt, Bacillus thuringiensis; EU, European Union; GE, genetically engineered; GM, genetically modified; HT, herbicide tolerant.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Biotech Chronicles [Internet]. Access Excellence at The National Health Museum Resource Center; c1994–2009 [updated 1999; cited 2015 Feb 3]. Available from: http://www.accessexcellence.org/RC/AB/BC/1977-Present.php.
    1. Bruening G, Lyons JM. The case of the flavr savr tomato. California Agriculture [Internet]. 2000 July-Aug [cited 2015 Feb 5];54(4):6–7. Available from: http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.org/landingpage.cfm?article=ca.v054n04p6.
    1. Benbrook CM. Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S.—the first sixteen years. Environ Sci Eur [Internet]. 2012 Sept 28 [cited 2015 Feb 4]; 24(24). Available from: http://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/2190–4715–24–24.pdf.
    1. Fernandez-Cornejo J. Agriculture Information Bulletin 786: The seed industry in U.S. agriculture: an exploration of data and information on crop seed markets, regulation, industry structure, and research development. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture; 2004 Feb.
    1. Fernandez-Cornejo J, Wechsler S, Livingston M, Mitchell L. Economic Research Report Number 162: Genetically engineered crops in the United States. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2014 Feb. [cited 2015 May 15]. Available from: http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/1282246/err162.pdf.