Spatial release from masking in insects: contribution of peripheral directionality and central inhibition
- PMID: 26567350
- DOI: 10.1242/jeb.127514
Spatial release from masking in insects: contribution of peripheral directionality and central inhibition
Abstract
The detection, identification and discrimination of sound signals in a large and noisy group of signalers are problems shared by many animals equipped with ears. While the signaling behavior of the sender may present several solutions, various properties of the sensory system in receivers may also reduce the amount of signal masking. We studied the effect of spatial release from masking, which refers to the fact that the spatial separation between the signaler and the masker can contribute to signal detection and discrimination. Except in a limited number of cases, the contribution of peripheral directionality or central nervous processing for spatial unmasking is not clear. We report the results of a study using a neurophysiological approach in two species of acoustic insects, whereby the activity of identified interneurons that either receive contralateral inhibitory input (crickets) or inhibit one another reciprocally in a bilateral pair (katydids) was examined. The analysis of the responses of a pair of omega neurons in katydids with reciprocal inhibition revealed that spatial separation of the masker from the signal facilitated signal detection by 19-20 dB with intact binaural hearing, but only by 2.5-7 dB in the monaural system, depending on the kind of analysis performed. The corresponding values for a behaviorally important interneuron of a field cricket (ascending neuron 1) were only 7.5 and 2.5 dB, respectively. We compare these values with those reported for hearing in vertebrates, and discuss the contribution of spatial release from masking to signal detection under real-world chorus conditions.
Keywords: Crickets; Directional hearing; Katydids; Masking noise.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Solutions to the cocktail party problem in insects: selective filters, spatial release from masking and gain control in tropical crickets.PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028593. Epub 2011 Dec 6. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 22163041 Free PMC article.
-
Neural Mechanisms for Acoustic Signal Detection under Strong Masking in an Insect.J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 22;35(29):10562-71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0913-15.2015. J Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26203150 Free PMC article.
-
Binaural modulation masking.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Mar;89(3):1340-9. doi: 10.1121/1.400657. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 2030221
-
Ecology of acoustic signalling and the problem of masking interference in insects.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015 Jan;201(1):133-42. doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0955-6. Epub 2014 Oct 29. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015. PMID: 25352362 Review.
-
Behind the mask(ing): how frogs cope with noise.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2023 Jan;209(1):47-66. doi: 10.1007/s00359-022-01586-7. Epub 2022 Oct 31. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36310303 Review.
Cited by
-
Vibrational noise disrupts Nezara viridula communication, irrespective of spectral overlap.Commun Biol. 2024 Nov 19;7(1):1533. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07185-3. Commun Biol. 2024. PMID: 39562693 Free PMC article.
-
Neurophysiology goes wild: from exploring sensory coding in sound proof rooms to natural environments.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2021 May;207(3):303-319. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01482-6. Epub 2021 Apr 9. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2021. PMID: 33835199 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How spatial release from masking may fail to function in a highly directional auditory system.Elife. 2017 Apr 25;6:e20731. doi: 10.7554/eLife.20731. Elife. 2017. PMID: 28425912 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
