Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;8(4):11-6.

Carotid Artery Stenosis with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Stenting versus Angioplasty

Affiliations

Carotid Artery Stenosis with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Stenting versus Angioplasty

Mark R Villwock et al. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: When a patient with carotid artery stenosis presents emergently with acute ischemic stroke, the optimum treatment plan is not clearly defined. If intervention is warranted, and open surgery is prohibitive, endovascular revascularization may be performed. The use of stents places the patient at additional risk due to their thrombogenic potential. The intent of this study was to compare outcomes following endovascular approaches (angioplasty alone vs. stent) in the setting of acute stroke.

Methods: We extracted a population from the National Inpatient Sample (2012) and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2011) composed of patients with carotid artery stenosis with infarction that were admitted nonelectively and received endovascular revascularization. Patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis were excluded. Categorical variables were compared between treatment groups with Chi-squared tests. Binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate mortality and iatrogenic stroke while controlling for age, case severity, and comorbidity burden.

Results: About 6,333 admissions met our criteria. A majority were treated via stenting (89%, n = 5,608). The angioplasty-alone group had significantly higher mortality (9.0% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001) and iatrogenic stroke rate (3.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001) than the stent group. The adjusted odds ratios of mortality and iatrogenic stroke for patients treated with angioplasty alone were 1.953 (p < 0.001) and 1.451 (p = 0.105), respectively, in comparison to patients treated with carotid stenting.

Conclusion: Multivariate analysis found the risk of mortality to be elevated following angioplasty alone. This may represent selection bias, but it also may indicate that symptomatic patients with stroke suffer from severe stenosis and unstable plaques that would benefit from stent placement. These results would caution angioplasty alone as an arm of a future randomized trial involving this severely burdened patient population requiring urgent intervention.

Keywords: acute ischemic stroke; angioplasty; carotid artery stenosis; endovascular; stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, Rankin RN, Clagett GP, Hachinski VC, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, Meldrum HE, Spence JD. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(20):1415–1425. - PubMed
    1. O’Brien M, Chandra A. Carotid revascularization: risks and benefits. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014;10:403–416. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baudier JF, Licht PB, Røder O, Andersen PE. Endovascular treatment of severe symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: early and late outcome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg. 2001;22(3):205–210. - PubMed
    1. Choudhri O, Gupta M, Feroze A, Albers G, Lansberg M, Do H, Dodd R, Marcellus M, Marks M. O-034 carotid artery angioplasty versus stenting in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerventional Surg. 2014;6( Suppl 1):A18–A19.
    1. Villwock MR, Singla A, Padalino DJ, Ramaswamy R, Deshaies EM. Optimum timing of revascularization for emergent admissions of carotid artery stenosis with infarction. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;127:128–33. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources