Objectives: To compare MR imaging features in patients with incidental mastoid T2-hyperintensity with those of clinical acute mastoiditis, to ascertain characteristic differences between them.
Methods: MR images of 35 adult and paediatric patients with clinical acute mastoiditis and 34 consecutive age-matched controls without relevant middle ear pathology and with incidental T2-hyperintensity that covered ≥ 50 % of the mastoid were retrospectively analysed with regard to signal, diffusion, and enhancement characteristics, and presence of complications.
Results: Incidental mastoid T2-hyperintensity that covered ≥ 50 % of the mastoid volume was found in 4.6 % of reviewed MR scans (n = 2341), and associated significantly (p < 0.05) less with the involvement of the tympanic cavity (38 % vs. 74 %) and mastoid antrum (56 % vs. 80 %), hypointense-to-CSF signal intensity on T2 FSE (6 % vs. 86 %), intramastoid diffusion restriction (0 % vs. 62 %), intense intramastoid enhancement (0 % vs. 51 %), periosteal enhancement (3 % vs. 69 %), perimastoid dural enhancement 3 % vs. 43 %), bone destruction (0 % vs 49 %), intratemporal abscess or cholesteatoma (0 % vs. 24 %), labyrinth involvement (0 % vs. 14 %), and extracranial abscesses (0 % vs. 20 %).
Conclusion: Hypointense-to-CSF signal intensity on T2WI, restricted diffusion, intense intramastoid enhancement among other MR imaging characteristics favoured an acute mastoiditis diagnosis over clinically non-relevant incidental mastoid pathology.
Key points: • Intramastoid T2-hyperintensity alone is not a reliable sign for acute mastoiditis. • In acute mastoiditis, intramastoid T2-weighted signal intensity is usually hypointense to CSF. • Diffusion restriction and intense intramastoid enhancement are absent in incidental mastoid effusion. • An ADC value ≥ 1.72 × 10 (-3) mm (2) /s contradicts the AM diagnosis.
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Mastoiditis; Middle ear; Otitis media; Temporal bone.