Potential Policies and Laws to Prohibit Weight Discrimination: Public Views from 4 Countries
- PMID: 26626983
- PMCID: PMC4678937
- DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12162
Potential Policies and Laws to Prohibit Weight Discrimination: Public Views from 4 Countries
Abstract
Context: People viewed as "overweight" or "obese" are vulnerable to weight-based discrimination, creating inequities and adverse health outcomes. Given the high rates of obesity recorded globally, studies documenting weight discrimination in multiple countries, and an absence of legislation to address this form of discrimination, research examining policy remedies across different countries is needed. Our study provides the first multinational examination of public support for policies and legislation to prohibit weight discrimination.
Methods: Identical online surveys were completed by 2,866 adults in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Iceland. We assessed public support for potential laws to prohibit weight-based discrimination, such as adding body weight to existing civil rights statutes, extending disability protections to persons with obesity, and instituting legal measures to prohibit employers from discriminating against employees because of body weight. We examined sociodemographic and weight-related characteristics predicting support for antidiscrimination policies, and the differences in these patterns across countries.
Findings: The majority of participants in the United States, Canada, and Australia agreed that their government should have specific laws in place to prohibit weight discrimination. At least two-thirds of the participants in all 4 countries expressed support for policies that would make it illegal for employers to refuse to hire, assign lower wages, deny promotions, or terminate qualified employees because of body weight. Women and participants with higher body weight expressed more support for antidiscrimination measures. Beliefs about the causes of obesity were also related to support for these laws.
Conclusions: Public support for legal measures to prohibit weight discrimination can be found in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Iceland, especially for laws to remedy this discrimination in employment. Our findings provide important information for policymakers and interest groups both nationally and internationally and can help guide discussions about policy priorities to reduce inequities resulting from weight discrimination.
Keywords: culture; discrimination; legislation; obesity.
© 2015 Milbank Memorial Fund.
Similar articles
-
Public opinion about laws to prohibit weight discrimination in the United States.Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Jan;19(1):74-82. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.126. Epub 2010 May 27. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011. PMID: 20508626
-
Legislating for weight-based equality: national trends in public support for laws to prohibit weight discrimination.Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Aug;40(8):1320-4. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.49. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016. PMID: 27089997
-
Support for laws to prohibit weight discrimination in the United States: public attitudes from 2011 to 2013.Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Aug;22(8):1872-9. doi: 10.1002/oby.20750. Epub 2014 Apr 8. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014. PMID: 24715378
-
Legal protection of the right to work and employment for persons with mental health problems: a review of legislation across the world.Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;28(4):375-84. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2016.1210575. Epub 2016 Aug 8. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27499197 Review.
-
Employment discrimination: another hurdle for cancer survivors.Cancer Invest. 1991;9(5):589-95. doi: 10.3109/07357909109018957. Cancer Invest. 1991. PMID: 1933491 Review.
Cited by
-
Weight bias internalization and beliefs about the causes of obesity among the Canadian public.BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):1621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16454-5. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37620795 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of support for anti-weight discrimination policies among Canadian adults.Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;11:1060794. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1060794. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37139379 Free PMC article.
-
Pervasiveness, impact and implications of weight stigma.EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 21;47:101408. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101408. eCollection 2022 May. EClinicalMedicine. 2022. PMID: 35497065 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Body shape and stable employment opportunity analysis of China's nonagricultural labor market.SSM Popul Health. 2021 Dec 27;17:101014. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101014. eCollection 2022 Mar. SSM Popul Health. 2021. PMID: 35024421 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Weight Stigma and Social Media: Evidence and Public Health Solutions.Front Nutr. 2021 Nov 12;8:739056. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.739056. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34869519 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Puhl H. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity. 2009;17(5):941–964. - PubMed
-
- Puhl R, Andreyeva T, Brownell K. Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes. 2008;32:992–1000. - PubMed
-
- Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9(12):788–905. - PubMed
-
- Rudolph CW, Wells CL, Weller MD, Baltes BB. A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace. J Vocat Behav. 2009;74(1):1–10.
-
- Roehling MV, Pichler S, Bruce TA. Moderators of the effect of weight on job-related outcomes: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2013;43(2):237–252.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
