Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;93(4):691-731.
doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12162.

Potential Policies and Laws to Prohibit Weight Discrimination: Public Views from 4 Countries

Affiliations

Potential Policies and Laws to Prohibit Weight Discrimination: Public Views from 4 Countries

Rebecca M Puhl et al. Milbank Q. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Context: People viewed as "overweight" or "obese" are vulnerable to weight-based discrimination, creating inequities and adverse health outcomes. Given the high rates of obesity recorded globally, studies documenting weight discrimination in multiple countries, and an absence of legislation to address this form of discrimination, research examining policy remedies across different countries is needed. Our study provides the first multinational examination of public support for policies and legislation to prohibit weight discrimination.

Methods: Identical online surveys were completed by 2,866 adults in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Iceland. We assessed public support for potential laws to prohibit weight-based discrimination, such as adding body weight to existing civil rights statutes, extending disability protections to persons with obesity, and instituting legal measures to prohibit employers from discriminating against employees because of body weight. We examined sociodemographic and weight-related characteristics predicting support for antidiscrimination policies, and the differences in these patterns across countries.

Findings: The majority of participants in the United States, Canada, and Australia agreed that their government should have specific laws in place to prohibit weight discrimination. At least two-thirds of the participants in all 4 countries expressed support for policies that would make it illegal for employers to refuse to hire, assign lower wages, deny promotions, or terminate qualified employees because of body weight. Women and participants with higher body weight expressed more support for antidiscrimination measures. Beliefs about the causes of obesity were also related to support for these laws.

Conclusions: Public support for legal measures to prohibit weight discrimination can be found in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Iceland, especially for laws to remedy this discrimination in employment. Our findings provide important information for policymakers and interest groups both nationally and internationally and can help guide discussions about policy priorities to reduce inequities resulting from weight discrimination.

Keywords: culture; discrimination; legislation; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Puhl H. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity. 2009;17(5):941–964. - PubMed
    1. Puhl R, Andreyeva T, Brownell K. Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes. 2008;32:992–1000. - PubMed
    1. Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9(12):788–905. - PubMed
    1. Rudolph CW, Wells CL, Weller MD, Baltes BB. A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace. J Vocat Behav. 2009;74(1):1–10.
    1. Roehling MV, Pichler S, Bruce TA. Moderators of the effect of weight on job-related outcomes: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2013;43(2):237–252.

Publication types