Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 20;6:588.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00588. eCollection 2015.

Molecular and Translational Classifications of DAMPs in Immunogenic Cell Death

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Molecular and Translational Classifications of DAMPs in Immunogenic Cell Death

Abhishek D Garg et al. Front Immunol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

The immunogenicity of malignant cells has recently been acknowledged as a critical determinant of efficacy in cancer therapy. Thus, besides developing direct immunostimulatory regimens, including dendritic cell-based vaccines, checkpoint-blocking therapies, and adoptive T-cell transfer, researchers have started to focus on the overall immunobiology of neoplastic cells. It is now clear that cancer cells can succumb to some anticancer therapies by undergoing a peculiar form of cell death that is characterized by an increased immunogenic potential, owing to the emission of the so-called "damage-associated molecular patterns" (DAMPs). The emission of DAMPs and other immunostimulatory factors by cells succumbing to immunogenic cell death (ICD) favors the establishment of a productive interface with the immune system. This results in the elicitation of tumor-targeting immune responses associated with the elimination of residual, treatment-resistant cancer cells, as well as with the establishment of immunological memory. Although ICD has been characterized with increased precision since its discovery, several questions remain to be addressed. Here, we summarize and tabulate the main molecular, immunological, preclinical, and clinical aspects of ICD, in an attempt to capture the essence of this phenomenon, and identify future challenges for this rapidly expanding field of investigation.

Keywords: anti-tumor immunity; immunogenicity; immunotherapy; molecular medicine; oncoimmunology; patient prognosis; translational medicine.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The molecular complexity of immunogenic cell death in cancer. Cancer cells undergoing immunogenic cell death (ICD) emit danger signals for establishing a productive interface with components of the host immune system, including dendritic cells (DCs). DCs exposed to cancer cells succumbing to ICD “prime” the adaptive arm of the immune system, consisting of various effector T-cell populations, which in turn targets therapy-resistant cancer cells. Various molecules are critical for the execution of these processes. The molecular network of ICD-relevant proteins was build using the STRING modeling database (http://string-db.org/) (126).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Population dynamics of antigen-specific T cells during an immune response to infection or cancer. (A) T cells capable of putatively recognizing non-self, pathogen-associated antigens (PAAs) are not exposed to negative selection in the thymus or peripheral organs like lymph nodes. This allows for the constitutive presence of T lymphocytes bearing high-affinity T-cell receptor (TCR) in naïve conditions. Upon infection, these cells undergo robust expansion and acquire potent effector functions, hence driving an immune response that clears the pathogen and PAAs. Finally, PAA-specific T cells undergo contraction along with the establishment of immunological memory. To a limited extent, T cells reacting against PAAs expressed by virus-induced tumors may exhibit similar (although not identical) responses. (B) T cells that may recognize self or close-to-self antigens expressed by virus-unrelated malignancies undergo robust negative selection in the thymus and lymph nodes. Thus, all putative T lymphocytes bearing a high-affinity TCR against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) are eliminated. However, some leakiness in this process allows for the persistence of TAA-specific T lymphocytes with low-affinity TCR, although at very low precursor frequencies. This is one of the reasons why in some individuals immunosurveillance at some stage fails to impede tumor progression. As malignant lesions progress, the amount of TAAs increases, causing a weak rise in TAA-specific T cells. However, tumor progression is generally coupled with the establishment of robust immunosuppressive networks that potently inhibit such TAA-targeting T cells. In this context, the administration of immunogenic cell death (ICD) according to a schedule that does not lead to lymphodepletion can favor the stimulation of TAA-targeting T cells and (re)instate immunosurveillance. Combining ICD inducers with checkpoint-blocking agents may further boost TAA-targeting immune responses. However, these treatments may not ensure the lifelong persistence of TAA-recognizing T cells, some of which are susceptible to elimination through tolerance mechanisms. Anticancer vaccines may counteract, at least to some extent, such loss. The figure was partly inspired from Baitsch et al. (234).

Similar articles

  • Cell death and immunity in cancer: From danger signals to mimicry of pathogen defense responses.
    Garg AD, Agostinis P. Garg AD, et al. Immunol Rev. 2017 Nov;280(1):126-148. doi: 10.1111/imr.12574. Immunol Rev. 2017. PMID: 29027218 Review.
  • Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death.
    Kepp O, Senovilla L, Vitale I, Vacchelli E, Adjemian S, Agostinis P, Apetoh L, Aranda F, Barnaba V, Bloy N, Bracci L, Breckpot K, Brough D, Buqué A, Castro MG, Cirone M, Colombo MI, Cremer I, Demaria S, Dini L, Eliopoulos AG, Faggioni A, Formenti SC, Fučíková J, Gabriele L, Gaipl US, Galon J, Garg A, Ghiringhelli F, Giese NA, Guo ZS, Hemminki A, Herrmann M, Hodge JW, Holdenrieder S, Honeychurch J, Hu HM, Huang X, Illidge TM, Kono K, Korbelik M, Krysko DV, Loi S, Lowenstein PR, Lugli E, Ma Y, Madeo F, Manfredi AA, Martins I, Mavilio D, Menger L, Merendino N, Michaud M, Mignot G, Mossman KL, Multhoff G, Oehler R, Palombo F, Panaretakis T, Pol J, Proietti E, Ricci JE, Riganti C, Rovere-Querini P, Rubartelli A, Sistigu A, Smyth MJ, Sonnemann J, Spisek R, Stagg J, Sukkurwala AQ, Tartour E, Thorburn A, Thorne SH, Vandenabeele P, Velotti F, Workenhe ST, Yang H, Zong WX, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Kepp O, et al. Oncoimmunology. 2014 Dec 13;3(9):e955691. doi: 10.4161/21624011.2014.955691. eCollection 2014 Oct. Oncoimmunology. 2014. PMID: 25941621 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Cancer immunogenicity, danger signals, and DAMPs: what, when, and how?
    Garg AD, Dudek AM, Agostinis P. Garg AD, et al. Biofactors. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):355-67. doi: 10.1002/biof.1125. Epub 2013 Jul 31. Biofactors. 2013. PMID: 23900966 Review.
  • Mitochondria-Targeting Immunogenic Cell Death Inducer Improves the Adoptive T-Cell Therapy Against Solid Tumor.
    Jiang Q, Zhang C, Wang H, Peng T, Zhang L, Wang Y, Han W, Shi C. Jiang Q, et al. Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 12;9:1196. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01196. eCollection 2019. Front Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31781498 Free PMC article.
  • Multimodal immunogenic cancer cell death as a consequence of anticancer cytotoxic treatments.
    Inoue H, Tani K. Inoue H, et al. Cell Death Differ. 2014 Jan;21(1):39-49. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.84. Epub 2013 Jul 5. Cell Death Differ. 2014. PMID: 23832118 Free PMC article. Review.
See all similar articles

Cited by 90 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Galluzzi L, Vacchelli E, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Buque A, Senovilla L, Baracco EE, et al. Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies. Oncotarget (2014) 5(24):12472–508.10.18632/oncotarget.2998 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kepp O, Tesniere A, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. The immunogenicity of tumor cell death. Curr Opin Oncol (2009) 21(1):71–6.10.1097/CCO.0b013e32831bc375 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garg AD, Dudek AM, Agostinis P. Cancer immunogenicity, danger signals, and DAMPs: what, when, and how? Biofactors (2013) 39(4):355–67.10.1002/biof.1125 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blankenstein T, Coulie PG, Gilboa E, Jaffee EM. The determinants of tumour immunogenicity. Nat Rev Cancer (2012) 12(4):307–13.10.1038/nrc3246 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garg AD, Nowis D, Golab J, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV, Agostinis P. Immunogenic cell death, DAMPs and anticancer therapeutics: an emerging amalgamation. Biochim Biophys Acta (2010) 1805(1):53–71.10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.08.003 - DOI - PubMed
Feedback