Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Dec;109(6):983-1002.
doi: 10.1037/pspa0000037.

When Is Shame Linked to Constructive Approach Orientation? A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

When Is Shame Linked to Constructive Approach Orientation? A Meta-Analysis

Colin Wayne Leach et al. J Pers Soc Psychol. .

Abstract

Despite recent evidence that episodic shame can be linked to the constructive approach of failure (i.e., prosociality, self-improvement), the prevailing view is that shame is neither constructive nor approach-oriented. To integrate these opposing views, we conducted a theory-driven meta-analysis of 90 samples from the published literature (N = 12,364). As expected, shame had a positive link to constructive approach when failure (g = .47, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.37, .55]) or social image (g = .37, 95% CI [.06, .68]) was more reparable. In contrast, shame had a negative link to constructive approach when failure was less reparable (g = -.34, 95% CI [-.53, -.14]). A supplemental meta-analysis of 42 samples showed shame and guilt to have a similar positive link to constructive approach orientation when failure was more reparable (g = .44 and .43), but not when it was less reparable (g = -.08 and .27).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback