Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jan;47(1):143-50.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke

Jesse Dawson et al. Stroke. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background and purpose: Recent animal studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with movement induces movement-specific plasticity in motor cortex and improves forelimb function after stroke. We conducted a randomized controlled clinical pilot study of VNS paired with rehabilitation on upper-limb function after ischemic stroke.

Methods: Twenty-one participants with ischemic stroke >6 months before and moderate to severe upper-limb impairment were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation or rehabilitation alone. Rehabilitation consisted of three 2-hour sessions per week for 6 weeks, each involving >400 movement trials. In the VNS group, movements were paired with 0.5-second VNS. The primary objective was to assess safety and feasibility. Secondary end points included change in upper-limb measures (including the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity).

Results: Nine participants were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation and 11 to rehabilitation alone. There were no serious adverse device effects. One patient had transient vocal cord palsy and dysphagia after implantation. Five had minor adverse device effects including nausea and taste disturbance on the evening of therapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores was not significantly different (between-group difference, 5.7 points; 95% confidence interval, -0.4 to 11.8). In the per-protocol analysis, there was a significant difference in change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score (between-group difference, 6.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 12.6).

Conclusions: This study suggests that VNS paired with rehabilitation is feasible and has not raised safety concerns. Additional studies of VNS in adults with chronic stroke will now be performed.

Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01669161.

Keywords: deglutition disorders; intention to treat analysis; rehabilitation; stroke; vagus nerve.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of vagus nerve stimulation device use in a typical therapy session.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Consort diagram. VNS indicates vagus nerve stimulation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Change in upper extremity Fugl–Meyer assessment (FMA-UE) score and baseline magnetic resonance imaging variables. These figures show change in FMA-UE score plotted against the baseline infarct volume (A) and the baseline corticospinal tract fractional anisotropy (FA) ratio (B). Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)–treated patients are shown in gray circles, and rehabilitation-only treated participants in black diamonds. Responders lie to the right of the vertical line.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 47 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Pollock A, St George B, Fenton M, Firkins L. Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:209. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70029-7. - PubMed
    1. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394–398. - PubMed
    1. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46:521–524. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health Care and Clinical Excellence, Stroke Rehabilitation. Long term rehabilitation after stroke. CG162, London: National Institute for Health Care and Clinical Excellence; 2013.
    1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741–754. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Feedback