The safety, efficacy, and durability of lung-volume reduction surgery: A 10-year experience
- PMID: 26670190
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.095
The safety, efficacy, and durability of lung-volume reduction surgery: A 10-year experience
Abstract
Objectives: The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) validated the efficacy of lung-volume reduction surgery (LVRS) in selected patients with emphysema; however, concerns about the safety and durability of the operation have limited its clinical application. We evaluated our experience with LVRS, for the time period since approval was given by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, with respect to surgical morbidity and mortality, early and late functional outcomes, and long-term survival.
Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 91 patients for whom consent was obtained for bilateral LVRS at our institution between January 2004 and June 2014. Primary outcomes analyzed were 6-month surgical mortality and overall survival at 1, 2, and 5 years. Secondary outcomes (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], residual volume, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, a 6-minute walk test, exercise capacity, and a shortness-of-breath questionnaire) were analyzed for mean change from baseline at 1, 2, and 5 years after LVRS.
Results: The 6-month surgical mortality rate was 0%. At the 1- and 5-year follow-up, 69% and 36% of the patients had an improvement in FEV1. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year FEV1 change in % predicted of the FEV1, compared with baseline after LVRS, respectively, was 11.1% (95% CI: 8.6%, 13.6%); 8.7% (95% CI: 6.1%, 11.4%); and 11.1% (95% CI: 7.1%, 15.0%); and the maximal workload (in watts [W]) had an average increase of: 10.7 W (95% CI: 6.9, 14.6); 7.6 W (95% CI: 2.8, 12.4); and 10.24 W (95% CI: 4.4, 16.1). Overall survival (95% CI) for the group was: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00) at 1 year; 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.00) at 2 years; and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.89) at 5 years.
Conclusions: Given proper patient selection, LVRS is a safe operation. Early functional measurements are consistent with significant clinical benefit. Long-term results demonstrate that improvements can be durable. Surgical LVRS continues to represent the standard for lung-volume reduction therapy.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; emphysema; lung volume reduction surgery.
Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Hey, pulmonologists and family doctors, please read me and see the data--It is a brave new world.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):725. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 10. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26651961 No abstract available.
-
Discussion.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):724. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.106. Epub 2015 Dec 6. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26670192 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Is lung volume reduction surgery effective in the treatment of advanced emphysema?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Mar;12(3):480-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.252213. Epub 2010 Dec 5. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21131683 Review.
-
Heterogeneity of lung volume reduction surgery outcomes in patients selected by use of evidence-based criteria.Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;95(6):1905-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.088. Epub 2013 May 3. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23647860
-
Results of lung volume reduction surgery in patients meeting a national emphysema treatment trial high-risk criterion.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Mar;127(3):829-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.09.004. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 15001913
-
Lung volume reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 14;10(10):CD001001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001001.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27739074 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lung-volume reduction surgery as an alternative or bridging procedure to lung transplantation.Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jul;82(1):208-13; discussion 213. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.004. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16798216
Cited by
-
Outcomes of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema: unilateral and bilateral.J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):6406-6416. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1655. Epub 2024 Oct 30. J Thorac Dis. 2024. PMID: 39552842 Free PMC article.
-
[The use of bronchial occlusion test in a preterm infant with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia complicated by severe lobar emphysema].Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 15;26(6):659-664. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2403014. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38926385 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Lung volume reduction surgery is safe and leads to functional improvement in patients who fail or cannot undergo bronchoscopic lung volume reduction.JTCVS Open. 2024 Feb 13;18:369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.02.004. eCollection 2024 Apr. JTCVS Open. 2024. PMID: 38690414 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema.Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Dec 20;32(170):230004. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0004-2023. Print 2023 Dec 31. Eur Respir Rev. 2023. PMID: 38123230 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Severe Emphysema Treated with Bilateral Lung Sealant: A Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up.Biomed Hub. 2023 Jun 26;8(1):46-53. doi: 10.1159/000530490. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Biomed Hub. 2023. PMID: 37405232 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
