Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Feb;27(2):138-149.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615612727. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence

Elliot M Tucker-Drob et al. Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

A core hypothesis in developmental theory predicts that genetic influences on intelligence and academic achievement are suppressed under conditions of socioeconomic privation and more fully realized under conditions of socioeconomic advantage: a Gene × Childhood Socioeconomic Status (SES) interaction. Tests of this hypothesis have produced apparently inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis of tests of Gene × SES interaction on intelligence and academic-achievement test scores, allowing for stratification by nation (United States vs. non-United States), and we conducted rigorous tests for publication bias and between-studies heterogeneity. In U.S. studies, we found clear support for moderately sized Gene × SES effects. In studies from Western Europe and Australia, where social policies ensure more uniform access to high-quality education and health care, Gene × SES effects were zero or reversed.

Keywords: behavior genetics; intelligence; open data; socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Variance in cognitive-test performance for the U.S. sample accounted for by genetic and environmental factors, graphed as a function of socioeconomic status (SES). Cognitive test scores were standardized to a z scale within each data set prior to model fitting. This plot is very close to (but not identical with) a plot in which the y-axis represents the instantaneous proportion of variance for each level of SES.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Funnel plot of effect-size estimates for the Gene × Socioeconomic Status interaction in the U.S. and non-U.S. samples. Each plotted point represents the standard error and effect-size estimate for a study included in the meta-analysis. The triangle-shaped regions indicate where 95% of the data points should lie if there is no (within-group) heterogeneity in population effect sizes. CI = confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler N. E., Newman K. (2002). Socioeconomic disparities in health: Pathways and policies. Health Affairs, 21(2), 60–76. - PubMed
    1. Asbury K., Wachs T. D., Plomin R. (2005). Environmental moderators of genetic influence on verbal and nonverbal abilities in early childhood. Intelligence, 33, 643–661.
    1. Bartels M., van Beijsterveldt C. E., Boomsma D. I. (2009). Breastfeeding, maternal education and cognitive function: A prospective study in twins. Behavior Genetics, 39, 616–622. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates T. C., Hansell N. K., Martin N. G., Wright M. J. (2015). When does socioeconomic status moderate the heritability of IQ? Evidence from an Australian adolescent sample. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    1. Bates T. C., Lewis G. J., Weiss A. (2013). Childhood socioeconomic status amplifies genetic effects on adult intelligence. Psychological Science, 24, 2111–2116. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources