A phase III randomized trial of epirubicin versus 5-fluorouracil in metastatic rectal/sigmoid adenocarcinoma

Am J Clin Oncol. 1989 Aug;12(4):332-4. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198908000-00011.

Abstract

Seventy-seven patients with previously untreated, measurable, histologically confirmed, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the rectum or sigmoid were randomized to receive either epirubicin 90 mg/m2 (75 mg/m2 if prior radiotherapy) i.v. once every 3 weeks or 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 (450 mg/m2 if prior radiotherapy) i.v. once daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. None of 38 (0%) evaluable patients who received epirubicin demonstrated a response, whereas seven of 39 (18%) patients who received 5-fluorouracil had an objective response. Epirubicin is ineffective against metastatic rectal cancer at the dose and schedule used.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / drug therapy*
  • Adenocarcinoma / mortality
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Epirubicin / administration & dosage
  • Epirubicin / therapeutic use*
  • Fluorouracil / administration & dosage
  • Fluorouracil / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Random Allocation
  • Rectal Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Rectal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Sigmoid Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Sigmoid Neoplasms / mortality
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Epirubicin
  • Fluorouracil