Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 17;163(7):1770-1782.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.022.

Control of Synaptic Connectivity by a Network of Drosophila IgSF Cell Surface Proteins

Affiliations

Control of Synaptic Connectivity by a Network of Drosophila IgSF Cell Surface Proteins

Robert A Carrillo et al. Cell. .

Abstract

We have defined a network of interacting Drosophila cell surface proteins in which a 21-member IgSF subfamily, the Dprs, binds to a nine-member subfamily, the DIPs. The structural basis of the Dpr-DIP interaction code appears to be dictated by shape complementarity within the Dpr-DIP binding interface. Each of the six dpr and DIP genes examined here is expressed by a unique subset of larval and pupal neurons. In the neuromuscular system, interactions between Dpr11 and DIP-γ affect presynaptic terminal development, trophic factor responses, and neurotransmission. In the visual system, dpr11 is selectively expressed by R7 photoreceptors that use Rh4 opsin (yR7s). Their primary synaptic targets, Dm8 amacrine neurons, express DIP-γ. In dpr11 or DIP-γ mutants, yR7 terminals extend beyond their normal termination zones in layer M6 of the medulla. DIP-γ is also required for Dm8 survival or differentiation. Our findings suggest that Dpr-DIP interactions are important determinants of synaptic connectivity.

Keywords: GFP tagging; Mimic; cell adhesion; immunoglobulin; optic lobe; synaptogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Dpr-ome network and the structure of the Dpr-DIP complex
(A) The current Dpr-ome. New interactions identified in this study are in red. (B) Structure of Dpr6-D1D2 bound to DIP-α-D1. The complex is formed by interactions between the D1s only. The D1s are related to each other by a near-symmetrical two-fold axis (closed oval). N-linked sugars are shown as sticks. (C) The same structure rotated to show the 130° angle between the interacting domains and the angle of approach of the two proteins. (D) Comparison of the DPR-DIP complex structure with two similar IgSF CAM complexes. Side chains for residues at the centers of interface are shown as sticks. (E) Superimposition of the Dpr6-DIP-α complex onto related D1 complexes. Dpr6 is in cyan and DIP-α in red. Note that the overall path of the main chains is almost identical to those in the SYG-1-SYG-2 complex. The Dpr6-DIP-α complex is less similar to JAML-CAR, and diverges most from the homophilic Nectin-2 complex.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Shape complementarity in the Dpr-DIP interface
(A) The interaction interface between Dpr6 (cyan) and DIP-α (red) is strongly hydrophobic and contains no salt bridges. The three side chain-to-side chain hydrogen bonds, including Dpr6 H114-DIP-α Q125, are labeled as dashes. The hydrophobic residues at the center of the interface, Dpr6 I115 and DIP-α I83, are also labeled. NAG represents the N-acetyl-DGlucosamine glycan residue on Dpr6 D1. (B) Equilibrium and kinetic parameters measured for the interactions between wild-type and mutant versions of Dpr6 and DIP-α, and Dpr11 and DIP-γ using SPR. For several mutants, binding kinetics were too fast to measure. Raw binding curves are in Figures S2E-F. (C) and (D) Rows of Dpr6 and DIP-α residues interdigitate, leading to shape complementarity between the two surfaces. Interestingly, Dpr6 Q156/158 and DIP-α K81 sidechains, while packing closely, do not form hydrogen bonds.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Expression of dpr and DIP genes in the larval ventral nerve cord
Projections of 3-6 confocal slices showing EGFP expression (green) and GAL4-driven nuclear dsRed expression (magenta) from: dpr11MiMIC MI02231 5’>EGFP (A, B, E), DIP-γMiMIC MI03222 5’>EGFP (C, D), dpr6MiMIC MI04582 GT (F, G), dpr10MiMIC MI03557 GT (H, I), and DIP-αMiMIC MI02031 GT (J, K). GT=gene trap. GAL4 drivers were: OK6 (motor neurons)(A, C, F, H, J); ChAT (cholinergic interneurons)(B, D, G, I, K); or DIP-γMiMIC MI03222→GAL4 (E). Arrows: cells expressing both dsRed reporter and GFP at high levels. Carets: cells expressing dsRed and low levels of GFP. Double carets: cells that express only dsRed. Caret in (E): a cell that has GFP but only low levels of dsRed. Focal planes are different for OK6 and ChAT images, so different dpr/DIP cells are seen. One pair of OK6+ dorsal midline motor neurons expresses dpr11 and DIP-γ, the other pair expresses DIP-α at high levels and DIP-γ at low levels, and dpr6 and dpr10 are expressed by both pairs. Scale bar: 5 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4. dpr11 and DIP-γ NMJ phenotypes
Panels A-I are muscle 4 NMJs. (A, Ai) GFP driven by dpr11GMR95G12-GAL4 (Janelia Farm) labels boutons (arrows). Note green puncta on the muscle surface. Magenta: anti-HRP. Scale bar: 5 μm. (B, Bi) Dpr11-EGFP-Dpr11 outlines anti-HRP-labeled boutons, and is observed postsynaptically outside of bouton borders (arrowhead) and on the muscle surface. Scale bar: 2 μm. (C, Ci): EGFP driven by DIP-γMiMIC MI03222→GAL4 labels boutons (arrow). Note green puncta on the muscle surface. Scale bar: 5 μm. (D-F) dpr11 and DIP-γ mutants have satellite bouton phenotypes (arrows indicate satellites). Anti-HRP staining. Insets: single 1b boutons. Scale bar: 5 μm. (G): Quantitation of satellite bouton phenotypes. Experimental genotypes in black, controls in grey. p<.0001 (***) for differences between relevant genotypes. (H-I): pMad is elevated at the NMJ in dpr11 mutants. Scale bar: 5μm. (J): Tracings of spontaneous events. Recordings from muscles 6 and 7. (K-L): Cumulative probability graphs of mEPSP amplitude (J) and mEPSP frequency (K). The curves for dpr11 and DIP-γ mutants (red and orange) are shifted to the right relative to all other genotypes. p<.0001 for mEPSP frequency change relative to controls, p<.001 for mEPSP amplitude (see Figure S4).
Figure 5
Figure 5. dprs and DIPs are expressed in optic lobe neurons projecting to specific medulla layers
(A) The Me, Lo, and Lop areas of the OL. Top images show OL orientation relative to the fly head. Me neuropil layers are labeled and profiles of neurons of interest are superimposed onto the diagram. Adapted from (Fischbach and Dittrich, 1989). Panels B-F are projections of 3-4 confocal slices of 80 hr. APF medullas. nc82 (anti-Brp; magenta) was used to identify neuropil layers (marked on the sides of panels). Asterisks highlight labeled layers; layer numbers are indicated at the sides of the panels. (B) dpr11MiMIC MI02231 5’>EGFP labels M3, M6 (weak) and M8-10. (C) DIP-γMiMIC MI03222 5’>EGFP labels M3, M6, M8, and M10. (D) Dpr6-EGFP-Dpr6 labels M1, M4, M6, M8, and M10. (E) dpr10MiMIC MI03557 GT labels M1, M3, M4, M8 (weak) and M10. (F) DIP-αMiMIC MI02031 GT labels M1, M3, M6, and M8. Scale bar: 10 μm for all panels.
Figure 6
Figure 6. dpr11 and DIP-γ are expressed by synaptically connected neurons
(A) R7 growth cones in M6 at 47 hr. APF, labeled by dpr11MiMIC MI02231 5’>EGFP (green) and 24B10 (magenta). A subset of R7s (arrows) express dpr11. Arrowheads, pR7s express only 24B10. Green layer is M3 (asterisk). Scale bars for (A-B): 5 μm. (B) dpr11MiMIC MI02231 5’>EGFP is selectively expressed by Rh4>tdTomato-expressing yR7s (magenta; arrows) in pupal retina at 80 hr. APF. Dotted circles outline a p (Rh3) ommatidium. (C) DIP-γMiMIC MI03222 5’>EGFP (white/green) labels M6 (arrows) at 47 hr. APF and colocalizes with a mCD8-RFP reporter driven by a Dm8-specific split-GAL4 driver (magenta). Red asterisks, DIP-γ expressing Me layers. Scale bar: 10 μm. (D) FLP-out labeling of a single DIP-γMiMIC MI03222→GAL4 expressing Dm8 (green), in an adult. R7/R8 axons are labeled by 24B10 (magenta). Brackets, M6 arborization; arrow, cell body. Scale bar: 5 μm. (E) FLP-out labeling of a single DIP-γMiMIC MI03222→GAL4 expressing LPTC, in an adult. Cell body, arrow; main dendrite, arrowhead. (F) dpr11 is expressed by T4 and T5 cells, as shown by double labeling with dpr11MiMIC MI02231 5’>EGFP (green) and a T4/T5-specific GAL4, R42F06, driving mCD8-RFP (magenta). Arrow, T4 dendrites in M10; arrowhead, T5 dendrites in Lo1. Note that, although there are 4 layers of the Lop labeled by the driver (magenta/white in panel F; asterisks), only Lop1 and Lop2 have green GFP labeling in panel Fi (white asterisks). (G) M10 labeling by dpr11MiMIC MI02231 5’>EGFP reflects dpr11 expression by T4s, because T4 axons connecting M10 to the Lop are double-labeled (arrows). (H) A subset of T4 and T5 cell bodies are labeled by dpr11MiMIC MI02231 5’>EGFP. A T4 /T5 cell bodies that expresses dpr11 (arrow) and one that does not (arrowhead) are labeled. (I) DIP-γMiMIC MI03222 5’>EGFP labels a zone in the Lop spanning Lop1/2 (brackets) at 47 hr. APF, most likely representing LPTC dendrites. Scale bars for (E-H): 10 μm.
Figure 7
Figure 7. dpr11 and DIP-γ mutations affect yR7 terminals and Dm8 cell numbers
(A) In dpr11MiMIC/+ adults, Brp-shortmCherry labeled yR7 terminals (magenta; white asterisks) line up in M6 at a point defined by the dark/light demarcation line in the EGFP labeling (green). Scale bar for (A-D): 5 μm. (B) In dpr11MiMIC/Df adults, some yR7s overshoot M6 and grow into deeper layers (red asterisks). White asterisks: yR7s that do not overshoot. Note that the shapes of all terminals are irregular, and that they are not aligned along the vertical axis. (C) In DIP-γMiMIC/+ adults, Brp-shortmCherry labeled yR7 terminals (magenta; white asterisks) are superimposed on Dm8 arborizations (green; arrow) labeled by EGFP. Red asterisk: a yR7 scored as an overshoot. (D) In DIP-γMiMIC/Df adults, some yR7s overshoot and terminal shape and alignment are altered, as in dpr11 mutants. Red triangles indicate yR7 overshoots in gaps where no DIP-γ+ Dm8 is present, and white triangles highlight yR7 overshoots that grow through a DIP-γ+ Dm8 arbor (arrows). (E) Quantitation of overshoot phenotypes. Overshoots tend to extend further in mutants (B, D) than in controls (C), but we have scored mutant and control overshoots as the same phenotype because we lack a quantitative way to distinguish them. (F-G) Imaris surface renderings of yR7 terminals in dpr11MiMIC/+ (F) and dpr11MiMIC/Df (G). White asterisks, terminals at normal positions; red asterisks, overshoot terminals. (H-I) R7 growth cones at 25 hr. APF in dpr11MiMIC/+ (H) and dpr11MiMIC/Df (I), visualized using PM181-GAL4 driving tdTomato. Asterisks indicate yR7s, identified by the dpr11MiMIC GFP marker. (J,K) In single confocal slices from DIP-γMiMIC/+ adults, the GFP-labeled M6 layer is continuous, but it has large gaps (red brackets) in DIP-γMiMIC/Df. (L,M) M6 gaps (brackets) are also seen in DIP-γ mutants when Dm8 arborizations are labeled using a Dm8-specific split-GAL4 driver/reporter. Scale bars for (F-I): 10 μm. (N,O) Quantitation of numbers of OrtC2b+ Dm8s (N) and of OrtC2b+ DIP-γ+ Dm8s (O) per OL in DIP-γMiMIC/+ and DIP-γMiMIC/Df.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berger-Muller S, Sugie A, Takahashi F, Tavosanis G, Hakeda-Suzuki S, Suzuki T. Assessing the role of cell-surface molecules in central synaptogenesis in the Drosophila visual system. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83732. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carrillo RA, Olsen DP, Yoon KS, Keshishian H. Presynaptic activity and CaMKII modulate retrograde semaphorin signaling and synaptic refinement. Neuron. 2010;68:32–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dong X, Xu F, Gong Y, Gao J, Lin P, Chen T, Peng Y, Qiang B, Yuan J, Peng X, et al. Crystal structure of the V domain of human Nectin-like molecule-1/Syncam3/Tsll1/Igsf4b, a neural tissue-specific immunoglobulin-like cell-cell adhesion molecule. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:10610–10617. - PubMed
    1. Fischbach KF, Dittrich APM. The optic lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. I. A Golgi analysis of wild-type structure. Cell and tissue research. 1989;258:441–475.
    1. Fouquet W, Owald D, Wichmann C, Mertel S, Depner H, Dyba M, Hallermann S, Kittel RJ, Eimer S, Sigrist SJ. Maturation of active zone assembly by Drosophila Bruchpilot. J Cell Biol. 2009;186:129–145. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data