Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 25 (4), 1227-1233

Comparison of Tunnel Variability Between Trans-Portal and Outside-In Techniques in ACL Reconstruction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Tunnel Variability Between Trans-Portal and Outside-In Techniques in ACL Reconstruction

Jae-Ang Sim et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.

Abstract

Purpose: Although trans-portal and outside-in techniques are commonly used for anatomical ACL reconstruction, there is very little information on variability in tunnel placement between two techniques.

Methods: A total of 103 patients who received ACL reconstruction using trans-portal (50 patients) and outside-in techniques (53 patients) were included in the study. The ACL tunnel location, length and graft-femoral tunnel angle were analyzed using the 3D CT knee models, and we compared the location and length of the femoral and tibial tunnels, and graft bending angle between the two techniques. The variability in each technique regarding the tunnel location, length and graft tunnel angle using the range values was also compared.

Results: There were no differences in the average of femoral tunnel depth and height between the two groups. The ranges of femoral tunnel depth and height showed no difference between two groups (36 and 41 % in trans-portal technique vs. 32 and 41 % in outside-in technique). The average value and ranges of tibial tunnel location also showed similar results in two groups. The outside-in technique showed longer femoral tunnel than the trans-portal technique (34.0 vs. 36.8 mm, p = 0.001). The range of femoral tunnel was also wider in trans-portal technique than in outside-in technique. Although the outside-in technique showed significant acute graft bending angle than trans-portal technique in average values, the trans-portal technique showed wider ranges in graft bending angle than outside-in technique [ranges 73° (SD 13.6) vs. 53° (SD 10.7), respectively].

Conclusions: Although both trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction can provide relatively consistent in femoral and tibial tunnel locations, trans-portal technique showed high variability in femoral tunnel length and graft bending angles than outside-in technique. Therefore, the outside-in technique in ACL reconstruction is considered as the effective method for surgeons to make more consistent femoral tunnel.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Outside-in; Reconstruction; Trans-portal.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Arthroscopy. 2010 Oct;26(10):1357-62 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2533-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1265-73 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12 ):2941-7 - PubMed
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Nov;20(11):2200-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback