Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;59(2):164-74.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.22560. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

Serious injury and fatality investigations involving pneumatic nail guns, 1985-2012

Affiliations

Serious injury and fatality investigations involving pneumatic nail guns, 1985-2012

Brian D Lowe et al. Am J Ind Med. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: This article examines serious and fatal pneumatic nail gun (PNG) injury investigations for workplace, tool design, and human factors relevant to causation and resulting OS&H authorities' responses in terms of citations and penalties.

Methods: The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) database of Fatality and Catastrophe Investigation Summaries (F&CIS) were reviewed (1985-2012) to identify n = 258 PNG accidents.

Results: 79.8% of investigations, and 100% of fatalities, occurred in the construction industry. Between 53-71% of injuries appear to have been preventable had a safer sequential trigger tool been used. Citations and monetary penalties were related to injury severity, body part injured, disabling of safety devices, and insufficient personal protective equipment (PPE).

Conclusions: Differences may exist between construction and other industries in investigators interpretations of PNG injury causation and resulting citations/penalties. Violations of PPE standards were penalized most severely, yet the preventive effect of PPE would likely have been less than that of a safer sequential trigger.

Keywords: accident investigation; pneumatic nail gun; struck by; traumatic injury; trigger safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fatality and Catastrophe Investigation cases (N=258) involving pneumatic nail gun injuries, shown by year, 1985-2012, and by Construction (ν) and Non-Construction sectors (ν). (Solid line shows new privately owned housing units under construction, with axis on right. Source: U.S. Census Bureau)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of injuries by affected body part grouped by injury severity. The full height of the bar represents 100%, but counts differ by degree of injury (severity). In six cases no body region was coded.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Median monetary penalty by classification of standards for Construction Sector inspections. There were 268 final penalties assessed. One willful violation of PNG standards was issued (not shown). (Penalties adjusted to 2013 dollars).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American National Standard Institute Safety Requirements for Portable, Compressed-Air-Actuated Fastener Driving Tools. ANSI SNT-101-2002. 2002
    1. Baggs J, Cohen M, Kalat J, Silverstein B. Technical report number 59-1-1999. Department of Labor and Industries; Olympia, WA: 1999. Pneumatic nailer (“nail gun”) injuries in Washington State, 1990-1998. Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP)
    1. Baggs J, Cohen M, Kalat J, Silverstein B. Pneumatic nailer injuries. A report on Washington State, 1990-1998. Professional Safety. 2001;32:33–38.
    1. California Code of Regulations Subchapter 2. Regulations of the Division of Occupational Safety and Health. Article 3. Reporting Work-Connected Injuries. §342. Reporting Work-Connected Fatalities and Serious Injuries. 2014a https://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/342.html (accessed April 22, 2014)
    1. California Code of Regulations Subchapter 4. Construction Safety Orders. Article 28. Miscellaneous Construction Tools and Equipment. §1704. Pneumatically Driven Nailers and Staplers. 2014b http://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/1704.html (accessed April 1, 2014)

MeSH terms