Management of lumbar spinal stenosis
- PMID: 26727925
- PMCID: PMC6887476
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h6234
Management of lumbar spinal stenosis
Abstract
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects more than 200,000 adults in the United States, resulting in substantial pain and disability. It is the most common reason for spinal surgery in patients over 65 years. Lumbar spinal stenosis is a clinical syndrome of pain in the buttocks or lower extremities, with or without back pain. It is associated with reduced space available for the neural and vascular elements of the lumbar spine. The condition is often exacerbated by standing, walking, or lumbar extension and relieved by forward flexion, sitting, or recumbency. Clinical care and research into lumbar spinal stenosis is complicated by the heterogeneity of the condition, the lack of standard criteria for diagnosis and inclusion in studies, and high rates of anatomic stenosis on imaging studies in older people who are completely asymptomatic. The options for non-surgical management include drugs, physiotherapy, spinal injections, lifestyle modification, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. However, few high quality randomized trials have looked at conservative management. A systematic review concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific type of non-surgical treatment. Several different surgical procedures are used to treat patients who do not improve with non-operative therapies. Given that rapid deterioration is rare and that symptoms often wax and wane or gradually improve, surgery is almost always elective and considered only if sufficiently bothersome symptoms persist despite trials of less invasive interventions. Outcomes (leg pain and disability) seem to be better for surgery than for non-operative treatment, but the evidence is heterogeneous and often of limited quality.
© BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2015.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare the following interests: CTL: none; JDL: consulting for FzioMed and the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation and stock options from NewVert; FzioMed and NewVert produce products related to surgery for intervertebral disc herniation but not for spinal stenosis. This work was supported in part by the Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Center in Musculoskeletal Diseases at Dartmouth, funded by NIAMS (P60-AR048094 and P60-AR062799).
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Lumbar spinal stenosis].Ugeskr Laeger. 2016 Oct 10;178(41):V04160245. Ugeskr Laeger. 2016. PMID: 27745582 Review. Danish.
-
Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review.JAMA. 2022 May 3;327(17):1688-1699. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5921. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35503342 Review.
-
MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):229-42. Pain Physician. 2016. PMID: 27228511 Clinical Trial.
-
MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Study Design and Protocol.Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):307-16. Pain Physician. 2015. PMID: 26218933 Clinical Trial.
-
Pathogenesis, presentation, and treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis associated with coronal or sagittal spinal deformities.Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Jan 15;14(1):e6. doi: 10.3171/foc.2003.14.1.7. Neurosurg Focus. 2003. PMID: 15766223 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of endoscopic interlaminar decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):26956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77337-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39505943 Free PMC article.
-
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Hypertrophy of Ligamentum Flavum.Biomolecules. 2024 Oct 10;14(10):1277. doi: 10.3390/biom14101277. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 39456209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual vs. single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical vs. asymmetrical plate designs.J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):386-394. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-13. Epub 2024 Aug 14. J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 39399071 Free PMC article.
-
Severity of lumbar spinal stenosis does not impact responsiveness to exercise-based rehabilitation.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Sep 23:2024.09.20.24314088. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.20.24314088. medRxiv. 2024. PMID: 39399031 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Finite element analysis of biomechanical investigation on diverse internal fixation techniques in oblique lumbar interbody fusion.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 12;25(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07887-z. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39395967 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:818-25. - PubMed
-
- Deyo RA. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a balancing act. Spine J 2010;10:625-7. - PubMed
-
- Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, et al. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine 2005;30:1441-5; discussion 1446-7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical