Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;25(12):977-985.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004242. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Displaying radiation exposure and cost information at order entry for outpatient diagnostic imaging: a strategy to inform clinician ordering

Affiliations

Displaying radiation exposure and cost information at order entry for outpatient diagnostic imaging: a strategy to inform clinician ordering

Jenna F Kruger et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Displaying radiation exposure and cost information at electronic order entry may encourage clinicians to consider the value of diagnostic imaging.

Methods: An urban safety-net health system displayed radiation exposure information for CT and cost information for CT, MRI and ultrasound on an electronic referral system for outpatient ordering. We assessed whether there were differences in numbers of outpatient CT scans and MRIs per month relative to ultrasounds before and after the intervention, and evaluated primary care clinicians' responses to the intervention.

Results: There were 23 171 outpatient CTs, 15 052 MRIs and 43 266 ultrasounds from 2011 to 2014. The ratio of CTs to ultrasounds decreased by 15% (95% CI 9% to 21%), from 58.2 to 49.6 CTs per 100 ultrasounds; the ratio of MRIs to ultrasounds declined by 13% (95% CI 7% to 19%), from 37.5 to 32.5 per 100. Of 300 invited, 190 (63%) completed the web-based survey in 17 clinics. 154 (81%) noticed the radiation exposure information and 158 (83.2%) noticed the cost information. Clinicians believed radiation exposure information was more influential than cost information: when unsure clinically about ordering a test (radiation=69.7%; cost=46.4%), when a patient wanted a test not clinically indicated (radiation=77.5%; cost=54.8%), when they had a choice between imaging modalities (radiation=77.9%; cost=66.6%), in patient care discussions (radiation=71.9%; cost=43.2%) and in trainee discussions (radiation=56.5%; cost=53.7%). Resident physicians and nurse practitioners were more likely to report that the cost information influenced them (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Displaying radiation exposure and cost information at order entry may improve clinician awareness about diagnostic imaging safety risks and costs. More clinicians reported the radiation information influenced their clinical practice.

Keywords: Attitudes; Decision making; Patient safety; Primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources