Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;77(1):7-16.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.7.

The Potential Impact of a "No-Buy" List on Youth Exposure to Alcohol Advertising on Cable Television

Affiliations

The Potential Impact of a "No-Buy" List on Youth Exposure to Alcohol Advertising on Cable Television

Craig S Ross et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to outline a method to improve alcohol industry compliance with its self-regulatory advertising placement guidelines on television with the goal of reducing youth exposure to noncompliant advertisements.

Method: Data were sourced from Nielsen (The Nielsen Company, New York, NY) for all alcohol advertisements on television in the United States for 2005-2012. A "no-buy" list, that is a list of cable television programs and networks to be avoided when purchasing alcohol advertising, was devised using three criteria: avoid placements on programs that were noncompliant in the past (serially noncompliant), avoid placements on networks at times of day when youth make up a high proportion of the audience (high-risk network dayparts), and use a "guardbanded" (or more restrictive) composition guideline when placing ads on low-rated programs (low rated).

Results: Youth were exposed to 15.1 billion noncompliant advertising impressions from 2005 to 2012, mostly on cable television. Together, the three no-buy list criteria accounted for 99% of 12.9 billion noncompliant advertising exposures on cable television for youth ages 2-20 years. When we evaluated the no-buy list criteria sequentially and mutually exclusively, serially noncompliant ads accounted for 67% of noncompliant exposure, high-risk network-daypart ads accounted for 26%, and low-rated ads accounted for 7%.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the prospective use of the no-buy list criteria when purchasing alcohol advertising could eliminate most noncompliant advertising exposures and could be incorporated into standard post-audit procedures that are widely used by the alcohol industry in assessing exposure to television advertising.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percentage of alcohol advertisements on low-rated cable television programs that exceeded the youth audience composition threshold during 2006–2012 based on the prior-year underage audience composition of purchased alcohol advertising. A “low-rated” program has an age 21 and older audience of fewer than 1,000,000 viewers (a rating of 0.50). A guardbanded audience composition limit is a lower audience composition threshold that is used to account for measurement variation so that the published specification is achieved.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackoff R. L., Emshoff J. R. Advertising research at Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (1963-68) Sloan Management Review. 1975;16:1–15.
    1. Anderson P., de Bruijn A., Angus K., Gordon R., Hastings G. Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2009;44:229–243. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agn115. - PubMed
    1. Austin E. W., Chen M. J., Grube J. W. How does alcohol advertising influence underage drinking? The role of desirability, identification and skepticism. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006;38:376–384. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.08.017. - PubMed
    1. Austin E. W., Hust S. J. T. Targeting adolescents? The content and frequency of alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverage ads in magazine and video formats November 1999-April 2000. Journal of Health Communication. 2005;10:769–785. doi:10.1080/10810730500326757. - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

Publication types