Frozen vs Fresh Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Clinical Resolution of Diarrhea in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 26757463
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.18098
Frozen vs Fresh Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Clinical Resolution of Diarrhea in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major burden in health care and community settings. CDI recurrence is of particular concern because of limited treatment options and associated clinical and infection control issues. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising, but not readily available, intervention.
Objective: To determine whether frozen-and-thawed (frozen, experimental) FMT is noninferior to fresh (standard) FMT in terms of clinical efficacy among patients with recurrent or refractory CDI and to assess the safety of both types of FMT.
Design, setting, and participants: Randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial enrolling 232 adults with recurrent or refractory CDI, conducted between July 2012 and September 2014 at 6 academic medical centers in Canada.
Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to receive frozen (n = 114) or fresh (n = 118) FMT via enema.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome measures were clinical resolution of diarrhea without relapse at 13 weeks and adverse events. Noninferiority margin was set at 15%.
Results: A total of 219 patients (n = 108 in the frozen FMT group and n = 111 in the fresh FMT group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population and 178 (frozen FMT: n = 91, fresh FMT: n = 87) in the per-protocol population. In the per-protocol population, the proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 83.5% for the frozen FMT group and 85.1% for the fresh FMT group (difference, -1.6% [95% CI, -10.5% to ∞]; P = .01 for noninferiority). In the mITT population the clinical resolution was 75.0% for the frozen FMT group and 70.3% for the fresh FMT group (difference, 4.7% [95% CI, -5.2% to ∞]; P < .001 for noninferiority). There were no differences in the proportion of adverse or serious adverse events between the treatment groups.
Conclusions and relevance: Among adults with recurrent or refractory CDI, the use of frozen compared with fresh FMT did not result in worse proportion of clinical resolution of diarrhea. Given the potential advantages of providing frozen FMT, its use is a reasonable option in this setting.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01398969.
Comment in
-
Expanded Evidence for Frozen Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridium difficile Infection: A Fresh Take.JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):137-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18100. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 26757461 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Frozen faecal matter works as well as fresh for transplantation in C difficile patients.BMJ. 2016 Jan 12;352:i138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i138. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26762142 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Oral, capsulized, frozen fecal microbiota transplantation for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection.JAMA. 2014 Nov 5;312(17):1772-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13875. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 25322359 Clinical Trial.
-
Is frozen fecal microbiota transplantation as effective as fresh fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection: A meta-analysis?Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Aug;88(4):322-329. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 18. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28602517 Review.
-
Administration of spores of nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strain M3 for prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA. 2015 May 5;313(17):1719-27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3725. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 25942722 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and preliminary efficacy of orally administered lyophilized fecal microbiota product compared with frozen product given by enema for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A randomized clinical trial.PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0205064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205064. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30388112 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Upper Versus Lower Gastrointestinal Delivery for Transplantation of Fecal Microbiota in Recurrent or Refractory Clostridium difficile Infection: A Collaborative Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 14 Studies.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;51(2):145-150. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000511. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 26974758 Review.
Cited by
-
An ecological framework to understand the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation.Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 3;11(1):3329. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17180-x. Nat Commun. 2020. PMID: 32620839 Free PMC article.
-
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection Associates With Functional Alterations in Circulating microRNAs.Gastroenterology. 2021 Jul;161(1):255-270.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.03.050. Epub 2021 Apr 9. Gastroenterology. 2021. PMID: 33844988 Free PMC article.
-
Orchestrating the fecal microbiota transplantation: Current technological advancements and potential biomedical application.Front Med Technol. 2022 Sep 22;4:961569. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.961569. eCollection 2022. Front Med Technol. 2022. PMID: 36212607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Monoclonal Antitoxin Antibodies (Actoxumab-Bezlotoxumab) Treatment Facilitates Normalization of the Gut Microbiota of Mice with Clostridium difficile Infection.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016 Oct 4;6:119. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00119. eCollection 2016. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27757389 Free PMC article.
-
Fecal microbiota transplantation with frozen capsules for a patient with refractory acute gut graft-versus-host disease.Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3097-3101. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024968. Blood Adv. 2018. PMID: 30446486 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
