Does usage of a parachute in contrast to free fall prevent major trauma?: a prospective randomised-controlled trial in rag dolls
- PMID: 26769034
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4381-z
Does usage of a parachute in contrast to free fall prevent major trauma?: a prospective randomised-controlled trial in rag dolls
Abstract
Purpose: It is undisputed for more than 200 years that the use of a parachute prevents major trauma when falling from a great height. Nevertheless up to date no prospective randomised controlled trial has proven the superiority in preventing trauma when falling from a great height instead of a free fall. The aim of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to prove the effectiveness of a parachute when falling from great height.
Methods: In this prospective randomised-controlled trial a commercially acquirable rag doll was prepared for the purposes of the study design as in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki, the participation of human beings in this trial was impossible. Twenty-five falls were performed with a parachute compatible to the height and weight of the doll. In the control group, another 25 falls were realised without a parachute. The main outcome measures were the rate of head injury; cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic fractures; and pneumothoraxes, hepatic, spleen, and bladder injuries in the control and parachute groups. An interdisciplinary team consisting of a specialised trauma surgeon, two neurosurgeons, and a coroner examined the rag doll for injuries. Additionally, whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to identify the injuries.
Results: All 50 falls-25 with the use of a parachute, 25 without a parachute-were successfully performed. Head injuries (right hemisphere p = 0.008, left hemisphere p = 0.004), cervical trauma (p < 0.001), thoracic trauma (p < 0.001), lumbar trauma (p < 0.001), pelvic trauma (p < 0.001), and hepatic, spleen, and bladder injures (p < 0.001) occurred more often in the control group. Only the pneumothoraxes showed no statistically significant difference between the control and parachute groups.
Conclusions: A parachute is an effective tool to prevent major trauma when falling from a great height.
Keywords: Evidence-based medicine; Fall; Parachute; Prevention; Trauma.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of the Chaos Falls Clinic in preventing falls and injuries of home-dwelling older adults: a randomised controlled trial.Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 8. Injury. 2014. PMID: 23579066 Clinical Trial.
-
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.BMJ. 2003 Dec 20;327(7429):1459-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1459. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 14684649 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevention of fall-related injuries in 7-year-old to 12-year-old children: a cluster randomised controlled trial.Br J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;47(14):909-13. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091439. Epub 2013 Jan 17. Br J Sports Med. 2013. PMID: 23329618 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevention of fall incidents in patients with a high risk of falling: design of a randomised controlled trial with an economic evaluation of the effect of multidisciplinary transmural care.BMC Geriatr. 2007 Jul 2;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-7-15. BMC Geriatr. 2007. PMID: 17605771 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Non-pharmacological means to prevent fractures among older adults.Ann Med. 2005;37(4):303-10. doi: 10.1080/07853890510007197. Ann Med. 2005. PMID: 16019730 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
