"We're checking them out": Indigenous and non-Indigenous research participants' accounts of deciding to be involved in research
- PMID: 26772174
- PMCID: PMC4715344
- DOI: 10.1186/s12939-016-0301-4
"We're checking them out": Indigenous and non-Indigenous research participants' accounts of deciding to be involved in research
Abstract
Background: It is important for researchers to understand the motivations and decision-making processes of participants who take part in their research. This enables robust informed consent and promotes research that meets the needs and expectations of the community. It is particularly vital when working with Indigenous communities, where there is a history of exploitative research practices. In this paper, we examine the accounts of Australian Indigenous and non-Indigenous research participants in terms of how and why they agree to take part in research.
Methods: A qualitative research approach was employed to undertake individual interviews with 36 research participants in Victoria, Australia. Eight participants identified as Indigenous and 28 were non-Indigenous. Thematic analysis was used to interpret the data.
Results: There were stark differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous research participants in terms of why and how they decided to participate in research. For Indigenous participants, taking part in research was primarily to benefit their communities rather than for personal interests. Indigenous participants often started from a position of caution, and showed a considered and deliberate process of decision making. In weighing up their decision to participate, some Indigenous participants clearly articulated what was valued in conducting research with Indigenous communities, for example, honesty, reciprocity, and respect; these values were explicitly used to assist their decision whether or not to participate. This was in contrast to non-Indigenous participants who took researchers' claims on face value, and for whom deciding to participate in research was relatively straightforward. The motivations to participate of non-Indigenous participants were due to personal interests, a desire to help others, or trust in the medical practitioner who recruited them for the research project.
Conclusion: Understanding research participants' motivations about taking part in research is important. This is particularly relevant for Indigenous communities where there is a reported history of research abuse leading to mistrust. This understanding can lead to research practice that is more respectful and responsive to the needs of Indigenous communities and abides by the values of Indigenous communities. Moreover it can lead to more ethical and respectful research practice for all.
Similar articles
-
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16242898
-
Do Research Participants Trust Researchers or Their Institution?J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Jul;13(3):285-294. doi: 10.1177/1556264618763253. Epub 2018 Mar 21. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018. PMID: 29561215
-
Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e356-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2589. Pediatrics. 2006. PMID: 16882778 Free PMC article.
-
Motivations of children and their parents to participate in drug research: a systematic review.Eur J Pediatr. 2016 May;175(5):599-612. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2715-9. Epub 2016 Apr 4. Eur J Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27041121 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review.BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 22;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0139-8. BMC Med Ethics. 2016. PMID: 27770780 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Inclusion of Underrepresented Populations in Cardiovascular Genetics and Epidemiology.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Feb 5;11(2):56. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11020056. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38392270 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"Sorry for laughing, but it's scary": humor and silence in discussions of Colorectal Cancer with Urban American Indians.BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 26;23(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11245-y. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37884866 Free PMC article.
-
Changing patient preferences toward better trial recruitment: an ethical analysis.Trials. 2023 Mar 28;24(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07258-4. Trials. 2023. PMID: 36973759 Free PMC article.
-
The 11th Canadian Symposium on Hepatitis C Virus: 'Getting back on track towards hepatitis C elimination'.Can Liver J. 2023 Feb 28;6(1):56-69. doi: 10.3138/canlivj-2022-0034. eCollection 2023 Feb. Can Liver J. 2023. PMID: 36908576 Free PMC article.
-
Starting the SToP trial: Lessons from a collaborative recruitment approach.PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0273631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273631. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36395106 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Smith LT. Decolonizing methodologies research and indigenous peoples. 2. London: Zed Books; 2012.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
