Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life
- PMID: 26784776
- PMCID: PMC4919118
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.18604
Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life
Abstract
Importance: Patients with advanced-stage cancer are receiving increasingly aggressive medical care near death, despite growing concerns that this reflects poor-quality care.
Objective: To assess the association of aggressive end-of-life care with bereaved family members' perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care and patients' goal attainment.
Design, setting, and participants: Interviews with 1146 family members of Medicare patients with advanced-stage lung or colorectal cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance study (a multiregional, prospective, observational study) who died by the end of 2011 (median, 144.5 days after death; interquartile range, 85.0-551.0 days).
Exposures: Claims-based quality measures of aggressive end-of-life care (ie, intensive care unit [ICU] admission or repeated hospitalizations or emergency department visits during the last month of life; chemotherapy ≤2 weeks of death; no hospice or ≤3 days of hospice services; and deaths occurring in the hospital).
Main outcomes and measures: Family member-reported quality rating of "excellent" for end-of-life care. Secondary outcomes included patients' goal attainment (ie, end-of-life care congruent with patients' wishes and location of death occurred in preferred place).
Results: Of 1146 patients with cancer (median age, 76.0 years [interquartile range, 65.0-87.0 years]; 55.8% male), bereaved family members reported excellent end-of-life care for 51.3%. Family members reported excellent end-of-life care more often for patients who received hospice care for longer than 3 days (58.8% [352/599]) than those who did not receive hospice care or received 3 or fewer days (43.1% [236/547]) (adjusted difference, 16.5 percentage points [95% CI, 10.7 to 22.4 percentage points]). In contrast, family members of patients admitted to an ICU within 30 days of death reported excellent end-of-life care less often (45.0% [68/151]) than those who were not admitted to an ICU within 30 days of death (52.3% [520/995]) (adjusted difference, -9.4 percentage points [95% CI, -18.2 to -0.6 percentage points]). Similarly, family members of patients who died in the hospital reported excellent end-of-life care less often (42.2% [194/460]) than those who did not die in the hospital (57.4% [394/686]) (adjusted difference, -17.0 percentage points [95% CI, -22.9 to -11.1 percentage points]). Family members of patients who did not receive hospice care or received 3 or fewer days were less likely to report that patients died in their preferred location (40.0% [152/380]) than those who received hospice care for longer than 3 days (72.8% [287/394]) (adjusted difference, -34.4 percentage points [95% CI, -41.7 to -27.0 percentage points]).
Conclusions and relevance: Among family members of older patients with fee-for service Medicare who died of lung or colorectal cancer, earlier hospice enrollment, avoidance of ICU admissions within 30 days of death, and death occurring outside the hospital were associated with perceptions of better end-of-life care. These findings are supportive of advance care planning consistent with the preferences of patients.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
How Do Claims-Based Measures of End-of-Life Care Compare to Family Ratings of Care Quality?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):900-907. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16905. Epub 2020 Nov 9. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021. PMID: 33165965
-
Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer.JAMA. 2003 May 7;289(17):2238-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.17.2238. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 12734135
-
Association Between Hospice Length of Stay, Health Care Utilization, and Medicare Costs at the End of Life Among Patients Who Received Maintenance Hemodialysis.JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):792-799. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0256. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29710217 Free PMC article.
-
When hospice is the best option: an opportunity to redefine goals.Oncology (Williston Park). 2009 Apr;23(4 Suppl Nurse Ed):13-7. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009. PMID: 19856592 Review.
-
Straddling the fence: ICU nurses advocating for hospice care.Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;24(1):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2012.01.006. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 22405716 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a prognostic model to predict 90-day mortality in hospitalised cancer patients (PROMISE tool): a prospective observational study.Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Oct 9;46:101063. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101063. eCollection 2024 Nov. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024. PMID: 39529819 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting serious illness conversations in primary care through telehealth among persons living with cognitive impairment.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3022-3034. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19100. Epub 2024 Jul 23. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024. PMID: 39041185
-
Cancer Doesn't Know the Day of the Week: Temporal Trends in Day of Death.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Jul 10:rs.3.rs-4708726. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4708726/v1. Res Sq. 2024. PMID: 39041025 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Clinician- and Patient-Directed Communication Strategies for Patients With Cancer at High Mortality Risk: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18639. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38949813 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Current status of advance care planning, palliative care consultation, and end-of-life care in patients with glioblastoma in South Korea.Oncologist. 2024 Nov 4;29(11):e1586-e1592. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae159. Oncologist. 2024. PMID: 38940449 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Earle CC, Park ER, Lai B, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ, Block S. Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 15;21(6):1133–1138. - PubMed
-
- Jacobson JO, Neuss MN, Hauser R. Measuring and Improving Value of Care in Oncology Practices: ASCO Programs from Quality Oncology Practice Initiative to the Rapid Learning System. American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting; 2012. pp. e70–76. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- R01 CA1604021/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA093329/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA093348/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA093324/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA164021/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA086862/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- NCI 166210/PHS HHS/United States
- R01 CA104021/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA093339/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- K07 CA166210/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA093344/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA91753/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA093326/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA093332/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 5U01CA093344-08/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA091753/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- K24 CA181510/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
