Introduction: According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5), a sexual fantasy (SF) is paraphilic if it concerns activities outside the realm of "genital stimulation or preparatory fondling with phenotypically normal, physically mature, consenting human partners" (normophilic). Intensity of the paraphilic SF is also "greater than or equal to normophilic interests." Surprisingly, however, very few data are available to corroborate that definition of a paraphilic SF. Although the relatively high prevalence of paraphilic SF in the general population is well known, the magnitude of difference between intensity of "normophilic" and "paraphilic" SF remains to be assessed.
Aim: The main goal of this study was to analyze the SF of adults recruited in the general population to obtain person profiles based on the nature and intensity of their SF.
Methods: Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) were used with data collected from 1,501 adults recruited in the general population to generate subgroups of participants based on the nature and intensity of their SF.
Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures used was a revised version of the Wilson Sex Fantasy Questionnaire.
Results: When all participants are considered as a unique group, the mean intensity of the most intense "normophilic" SF (oral sex) is significantly higher than the mean intensity of the most intense "paraphilic" SF (being sexually dominated for women and watching two women having sex for men), as expected from the DSM-5. When clusters of participants are considered separately, however, conclusions are nuanced. Four significant clusters of participants (two predominantly female and two predominantly male) reported at least one paraphilic SF with intensity as high as that of their most intense "normophilic" SF. In fact, 57% of this sample met the criteria of paraphilia.
Conclusion: These results suggest that the current criteria for paraphilia are too inclusive. Suggestions are given to improve the definition of pathological sexual interests, and the crucial difference between SF and sexual interest is underlined. Joyal CC. Defining "normophilic" and "paraphilic" sexual fantasies in a population-based sample: On the importance of considering subgroups. Sex Med 2015;3:321-330.
Keywords: DSM‐5; General population; Normophilia; Paraphilia; Sexual fantasies.
Deviance or Normalcy? The Relationship Among Paraphilic Thoughts and Behaviors, Hypersexuality, and Psychopathology in a Sample of University Students.J Sex Med. 2018 Sep;15(9):1322-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.015. J Sex Med. 2018. PMID: 30224020 Clinical Trial.
What exactly is an unusual sexual fantasy?J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):328-40. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12734. Epub 2014 Oct 31. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 25359122
The Prevalence of Paraphilic Interests and Behaviors in the General Population: A Provincial Survey.J Sex Res. 2017 Feb;54(2):161-171. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1139034. Epub 2016 Mar 3. J Sex Res. 2017. PMID: 26941021
Assessment of Sexual Fantasies in Psychiatric Inpatients With Mood and Psychotic Disorders and Comorbid Personality Disorder Traits.J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):262-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 20. J Sex Med. 2016. PMID: 26803456 Review.
Legal and Policy Considerations in Lebanon Related to Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases Manual, 11th Version.J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):491-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 15. J Sex Med. 2020. PMID: 31953030 Review.
Cited by 1 article
Disorders related to sexuality and gender identity in the ICD-11: revising the ICD-10 classification based on current scientific evidence, best clinical practices, and human rights considerations.World Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;15(3):205-221. doi: 10.1002/wps.20354. World Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27717275 Free PMC article.
- American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth edition Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. 991 pp.
- Joyal CC. How anomalous are paraphilic interests? Arch Sex Behav 2014;43:1241–1243. - PubMed
- Leitenberg H, Henning K. Sexual fantasy. Psychol Bull 1995;117:469–496. - PubMed
- Joyal CC, Cossette A, Lapierre V. What exactly is an unusual sexual fantasy? J Sex Med 2015;12:328–340. - PubMed
- Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. 750 pp.