Discrimination of bacteriophage infected cells using locked nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (LNA-FISH)
- PMID: 26813295
- DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2015.1131821
Discrimination of bacteriophage infected cells using locked nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (LNA-FISH)
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum.Biofouling. 2016;32(2):ii. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2016.1153316. Biofouling. 2016. PMID: 26901589 No abstract available.
Abstract
Bacteriophage-host interaction studies in biofilm structures are still challenging due to the technical limitations of traditional methods. The aim of this study was to provide a direct fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes, which targets the phage replication phase, allowing the study of population dynamics during infection. Bacteriophages specific for two biofilm-forming bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter, were selected. Four LNA probes were designed and optimized for phage-specific detection and for bacterial counterstaining. To validate the method, LNA-FISH counts were compared with the traditional plaque forming unit (PFU) technique. To visualize the progression of phage infection within a biofilm, colony-biofilms were formed and infected with bacteriophages. A good correlation (r = 0.707) was observed between LNA-FISH and PFU techniques. In biofilm structures, LNA-FISH provided a good discrimination of the infected cells and also allowed the assessment of the spatial distribution of infected and non-infected populations.
Keywords: Acinetobacter; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; bacteriophage; biofilms; phage infection, LNA-FISH.
Similar articles
-
Monitoring Bacteriophage Infection on Bacterial Cells Using FISH.Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2246:157-168. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1115-9_11. Methods Mol Biol. 2021. PMID: 33576989
-
Application of locked nucleic acid-based probes in fluorescence in situ hybridization.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;100(13):5897-906. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7429-4. Epub 2016 Mar 12. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016. PMID: 26969040
-
Potential of a lytic bacteriophage to disrupt Acinetobacter baumannii biofilms in vitro.Future Microbiol. 2016 Oct;11:1383-1393. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2016-0104. Epub 2016 Aug 18. Future Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27538011
-
The role of Nucleic Acid Mimics (NAMs) on FISH-based techniques and applications for microbial detection.Microbiol Res. 2022 Sep;262:127086. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127086. Epub 2022 Jun 9. Microbiol Res. 2022. PMID: 35700584 Review.
-
Use of bacteriophages in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013 Sep;11(9):909-15. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2013.826990. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013. PMID: 24053272 Review.
Cited by
-
How Do Phages Disrupt the Structure of Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm?Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 8;24(24):17260. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417260. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 38139094 Free PMC article.
-
Vibrio-infecting bacteriophages and their potential to control biofilm.Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 19;32(12):1719-1727. doi: 10.1007/s10068-023-01361-7. eCollection 2023 Oct. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37780594 Review.
-
Imaging biofilms using fluorescence in situ hybridization: seeing is believing.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 May 22;13:1195803. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1195803. eCollection 2023. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37284501 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The resistance mechanisms of bacteria against ciprofloxacin and new approaches for enhancing the efficacy of this antibiotic.Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;10:1025633. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025633. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36620240 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Monitoring Bacteriophage Infection on Bacterial Cells Using FISH.Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2246:157-168. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1115-9_11. Methods Mol Biol. 2021. PMID: 33576989
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources

