Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan-Feb;131 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):30-40.
doi: 10.1177/00333549161310S105.

Routine HIV Screening in an Urban Community Health Center: Results from a Geographically Focused Implementation Science Program

Affiliations

Routine HIV Screening in an Urban Community Health Center: Results from a Geographically Focused Implementation Science Program

Amy Nunn et al. Public Health Rep. 2016 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: CDC has recommended routine HIV screening since 2006. However, few community health centers (CHCs) routinely offer HIV screening. Research is needed to understand how to implement routine HIV screening programs, particularly in medically underserved neighborhoods with high rates of HIV infection. A routine HIV screening program was implemented and evaluated in a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, neighborhood with high rates of HIV infection.

Methods: Implementation science is the study of methods to promote the integration of research findings and evidence into health-care policy and practice. Using an implementation science approach, the results of the program were evaluated by measuring acceptability, adoption, and penetration of routine HIV screening.

Results: A total of 5,878 individuals were screened during the program. HIV screening was highly accepted among clinic patients. In an initial needs assessment of 516 patients, 362 (70.2%) patients reported that they would accept testing if offered. Routine screening policies were adopted clinic-wide. Staff trainings, new electronic medical records that prompted staff members to offer screening and evaluate screening rates, and other continuing quality-improvement policies helped promote screenings. HIV screening offer rates improved from an estimated 5.0% of eligible patients at baseline in March 2012 to an estimated 59.3% of eligible patients in December 2014. However, only 5,878 of 13,827 (42.5%) patients who were offered screening accepted it, culminating in a 25.2% overall screening rate. Seventeen of the 5,878 patients tested positive, for a seropositivity rate of 0.3%.

Conclusion: Routine HIV screening at CHCs in neighborhoods with high rates of HIV infection is feasible. Routine screening is an important tool to improve HIV care continuum outcomes and to address racial and geographic disparities in HIV infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Emergency medical record (EMR) intake form at an urban health center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2012–2014
Figure 1
Figure 1
Emergency medical record (EMR) intake form at an urban health center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2012–2014
Figure 1
Figure 1
Emergency medical record (EMR) intake form at an urban health center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2012–2014
Figure 2
Figure 2
Policy changes and HIV screening offer rates by month at an urban health center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2012–2014
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of HIV screenings offered and conducted by month at an urban health center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2012–2014
Figure 4
Figure 4
Reasons for decline given by patients declining HIV screening at an urban health center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2012–2014

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US) Atlanta: CDC; 2012. HIV in the United States: the stages of care. Also available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/research_mmp_stagesofcare.pdf [cited 2014 Sep 1]
    1. Mahle Gray K, Tang T, Shouse L, Li J, Mermin J, Hall HI. Using the HIV surveillance system to monitor the National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:141–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39:446–53. - PubMed
    1. Hall HI, Holtgrave DR, Maulsby C. HIV transmission rates from persons living with HIV who are aware and unaware of their infection. AIDS. 2012;26:893–6. - PubMed
    1. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1–17. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources