Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1291-309.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12459. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Changes in Consumer Demand Following Public Reporting of Summary Quality Ratings: An Evaluation in Nursing Homes

Affiliations

Changes in Consumer Demand Following Public Reporting of Summary Quality Ratings: An Evaluation in Nursing Homes

Rachel M Werner et al. Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Limited consumer use of health care report cards may be due to the large amount of information presented in report cards, which can be difficult to understand. These limitations may be overcome with summary measures. Our objective was to evaluate consumer response to summary measures in the setting of nursing homes.

Data sources/study setting: 2005-2010 nursing home Minimum Data Set and Online Survey, Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) datasets.

Study design: In December 2008, Medicare converted its nursing home report card to summary or star ratings. We test whether there was a change in consumer demand for nursing homes related to the nursing home's star rating after the information was released.

Principal findings: The star rating system was associated with a significant change in consumer demand for low- and high-scoring facilities. After the star-based rating system was released, 1-star facilities typically lost 8 percent of their market share and 5-star facilities gained over 6 percent of their market share.

Conclusions: The nursing home star rating system significantly affected consumer demand for high- and low-rated nursing homes. These results support the use of summary measures in report cards.

Keywords: Quality of care; nursing home; public reporting; quality measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of the Star Ratings Available for Nursing Homes on the Nursing Home Compare Website
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent of Nursing Home Admissions in Each Star Category. (The vertical line represents the release of the 5‐star report card in December 2008)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abt Associates Inc . 2014. Nursing Home Compare Five‐Star Quality Rating System: Year Five Report (Public Version). Baltimore, MD: Abt Associates Inc.
    1. Baker, D. W. , Einstadter D., Thomas C., Husak S., Gordon N. H., and Cebul R. D.. 2003. “The Effect of Publicly Reporting Hospital Performance on Market Share and Risk‐Adjusted Mortality at High‐Mortality Hospitals.” Medical Care 41 (6): 729–40. - PubMed
    1. Banaszak‐Holl, J. , Zinn J. S., Brannon D., Castle N. G., and Mor V.. 1997. “Specialization and Diversification in the Nursing Home Industry.” Health Care Managing Review 3 (1): 91–9. - PubMed
    1. Berwick, D. M. , James B., Coye M. J.. 2003. “Connections between Quality Measurement and Improvement.” Medical Care 41 (1 Suppl): 30–8. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid . 2002, 1/20/2004. “Nursing Home Quality Initiatives Overview” [accessed on January 14, 2006]. Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NursingHomeQualityInits/downloads/NHQIOverview.pdf

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources